2021
DOI: 10.1063/5.0066366
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Droplet impact dynamics on single-pillar superhydrophobic surfaces

Abstract: While ridged, spherical, or cone superhydrophobic surfaces have been extensively utilized to explore the droplet impact dynamics and the possibility of reducing contact time, superhydrophobic surfaces with a single small pillar have received less attention. Here, we report the rebound and splashing phenomena of impact droplets on various single-pillar superhydrophobic surfaces with the pillars having smaller or equal sizes compared to the droplets. Our results indicate that the single-pillar superhydrophobic s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was found that liquid possessed a faster retraction along the ridge than that on the flat surface, leading to a 37% reduction in contact time. 21 Following this work, studies focused on contact time reduction by asymmetric dynamics have been carried out, including the inclined surface, 22,23 curved surface, [24][25][26][27][28][29][30] surfaces with macro structures of different geometries, [31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40] moving surfaces, 41,42 and off-center impact. 43,44 Besides the aforementioned asymmetric approaches, symmetric bouncing by involving the droplet center to retraction with point-like structure to reduce contact time has also been proposed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was found that liquid possessed a faster retraction along the ridge than that on the flat surface, leading to a 37% reduction in contact time. 21 Following this work, studies focused on contact time reduction by asymmetric dynamics have been carried out, including the inclined surface, 22,23 curved surface, [24][25][26][27][28][29][30] surfaces with macro structures of different geometries, [31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40] moving surfaces, 41,42 and off-center impact. 43,44 Besides the aforementioned asymmetric approaches, symmetric bouncing by involving the droplet center to retraction with point-like structure to reduce contact time has also been proposed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To ensure that the droplets did not break up, the tip-to-surface distance and droplet size were rationally selected such that the Weber number (We) is sufficiently small (We ≈ 2.6). 42 The bouncing time is quantified as the total time that the droplet spends bouncing on the surface prior to pinning. We used the droplet-bouncing method due to its advantages in comparison to static or dynamic contact angle and droplet roll-off measurements.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deionized water droplets (D140 Culligan deionizer system) having 10 ± 0.002 μL volumes were individually released from a capillary tip (CLS4853-400EA, Corning) with the tip-to-surface distance maintained at 7 ± 0.1 mm (Section S3 in the Supporting Information). To ensure that the droplets did not break up, the tip-to-surface distance and droplet size were rationally selected such that the Weber number (We) is sufficiently small (We ≈ 2.6) . The bouncing time is quantified as the total time that the droplet spends bouncing on the surface prior to pinning.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They found that the contact time of droplets impacting on an SHS decorated with a macroscopic ridge was reduced by about 37% because of the asymmetric spreading and retraction. Since then, SHSs with various submillimetric or millimetric macrostructures have been designed and fabricated (such as cylindrical/semicylindrical ridges, trigonal ridges, cuboid ridges, , cylindrical/conical pillars, suspending cylinders, , and point-like protrusions), and the contact time on most structural surfaces is reduced by about 30–50% compared to that on horizontal flat SHSs. Recently, macrostructures (such as a dimple and circular grooves) have been further used to navigate the transport of droplets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%