2013
DOI: 10.1017/jfm.2013.201
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Droplet motion on inclined heterogeneous substrates

Abstract: We consider the static and dynamic behaviour of two-dimensional droplets on inclined heterogeneous substrates. We utilize an evolution equation for the droplet thickness based on the long-wave approximation of the Stokes equations in the presence of slip. Through a singular perturbation procedure, evolution equations for the location of the two moving fronts are obtained under the assumption of quasistatic dynamics. The deduced equations, which are verified by direct comparisons with numerical solutions to the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
50
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
4
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By assuming that the dynamics is quasi-static, we have utilised the method of matched asymptotic expansions to deduce a set of IDEs for the evolution of the two droplet fronts in the limit of long oscillation periods. This analysis, which was verified by numerous numerical experiments performed throughout this work, was largely based on the recent work of the present authors on inclined heterogeneous substrates (Savva & Kalliadasis 2013). It is important to emphasise that even though we assumed the presence of slip in our model, our results can be easily mapped to other types of models that are commonly used to relax the stress singularity occurring at a moving contact line (see, for example Sibley et al 2012Sibley et al , 2013b.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…By assuming that the dynamics is quasi-static, we have utilised the method of matched asymptotic expansions to deduce a set of IDEs for the evolution of the two droplet fronts in the limit of long oscillation periods. This analysis, which was verified by numerous numerical experiments performed throughout this work, was largely based on the recent work of the present authors on inclined heterogeneous substrates (Savva & Kalliadasis 2013). It is important to emphasise that even though we assumed the presence of slip in our model, our results can be easily mapped to other types of models that are commonly used to relax the stress singularity occurring at a moving contact line (see, for example Sibley et al 2012Sibley et al , 2013b.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Even though our model does not incorporate the effects of contact angle hysteresis by prescribing advancing and receding contact angles, that would pin the droplet fronts, the use of heterogeneities can yield hysteresis like-effects. Besides, we also ascribe to the view that heterogeneities are the principal source of contact angle hysteresis (see also discussion on non-vibrating droplets on inclined substrates, Savva & Kalliadasis 2013).…”
Section: Hysteresis-like Effectsmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In all cases we found that the drop moves down the incline with a constant speed which increases monotonically with the tilt angle. [Remarkably, in a 2D study of a drop on an inclined (chemically heterogeneous) substrate, Savva and Kalliadasis (2013) also find that the drop can move with a constant velocity.] At each instant in time, droplet profiles were recorded based on the ˜ φ = 1 / 2 isosurface.…”
Section: The Contact Anglementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The possibility of using chemically heterogeneous surfaces (CHS) to guide wetting drops along certain directions has recently attracted much attention both theoretically [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32] and experimentally [33][34][35][36][37][38]. In these studies, the driving force is provided by the down-plane component of the drop weight F g = ρVgsinα, acting on a drop of volume V and density ρ sliding down an inclined plane tilted by an angle α (see Figure 3).…”
Section: Basic Principlesmentioning
confidence: 99%