2018
DOI: 10.1017/s1755048317000694
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dropping the Curtain: The Religious-Secular Party Cleavage in German Morality Politics

Abstract: This study examines the religious-secular party cleavage in German morality politics from a new perspective by tracing politicization patterns at the individual level. It builds on the idea of issue competition and explores whether conflicts between Christian Democrats and secular parties align with the traditional denominational divide between Catholics and non-Catholics or with religiosity. By means of logistic regressions of Member of Parliaments’ politicization behavior in the German Bundestag (1998–2002) … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, socio-cultural determinants were factored in by the selection of one pair of cities with a primarily Catholic population (Bonn (39.0 percent) Cologne (38.4 percent) and one pair with a primarily Protestant population (Essen (27.3 percent), Dortmund (32.0 percent) (all data for 2013). As Catholicism is still a valid signifier of conservative attitudes in moral issues in Germany (Euchner and Preidel, 2018), this factor might explain more conservative frames in these cities. Third, with regard to the partisan composition of the city governments, the cities represent counterintuitive cases.…”
Section: Methodological Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, socio-cultural determinants were factored in by the selection of one pair of cities with a primarily Catholic population (Bonn (39.0 percent) Cologne (38.4 percent) and one pair with a primarily Protestant population (Essen (27.3 percent), Dortmund (32.0 percent) (all data for 2013). As Catholicism is still a valid signifier of conservative attitudes in moral issues in Germany (Euchner and Preidel, 2018), this factor might explain more conservative frames in these cities. Third, with regard to the partisan composition of the city governments, the cities represent counterintuitive cases.…”
Section: Methodological Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Germany, the discussion on morality policies has highlighted the persistence and salience of the conflict between the coalition (Christian Democratic Union (CDU) and Christian Social Union (CSU)) and secular parties (Euchner and Preidel 2018: 243). While the participation of the Social Democratic Party (SPD) in the grand coalition together with the CDU–CSU for most of the last 20 years has favoured a de-radicalization of the conflict on this domain, nevertheless the log-odds value shows a greater weight of religion vis-à-vis class: 0.94 versus 0.03.…”
Section: Religion Over Class With Exceptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The role of religion is also prominent in the 'two worlds' perspective developed by Engeli et al (2012; see also van Kersbergen and Lindberg 2015;Euchner and Preidel, 2018;Hurka et al 2018;Hildebrandt 2016). The argument from this perspective is that the politics of morality issues differ fundamentally depending on whether countries belong to the 'secular' or 'religious' world.…”
Section: Morality Issues and The Role Of Roman Catholic Churchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Morality issues like abortion and same-sex marriage, which touch on core teachings of the RC Church, are among those on which the question of its political role is most pertinent. Therefore, it is not surprising that the role of churches and especially the RC Church has become a central theme in the rapidly growing literature on the politics of morality issues (e.g., Knill and Preidel 2015;Euchner and Preidel 2018;Budde et al 2018). One central discussion within this literature relates to the idea of 'two worlds of morality politics', presented by Engeli et al (2012; see also Euchner 2019;Hurka et al 2018;Adam et al 2019;Studlar et al 2013).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%