2013
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1310672110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Drops on soft surfaces learn the hard way

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The typical approach in the production of superhydrophobic surfaces is increasing surface roughness, through chemical modifications [27] and tuning mechanical properties of materials, such as stiffness [28]. The first one, roughness, can be controlled on electrospun surfaces via decorating of fiber surfaces [29], wrinkling [30,31], introducing core-shell [32] or core-sheath structures [33], and various surface treatment methods [34,35], which brings us to the second case.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The typical approach in the production of superhydrophobic surfaces is increasing surface roughness, through chemical modifications [27] and tuning mechanical properties of materials, such as stiffness [28]. The first one, roughness, can be controlled on electrospun surfaces via decorating of fiber surfaces [29], wrinkling [30,31], introducing core-shell [32] or core-sheath structures [33], and various surface treatment methods [34,35], which brings us to the second case.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to these merits, many studies have been performed with regard to droplet control 1 . For instance, passive methods utilizing channel geometry 2 – 4 , magnetic forces 5 – 7 , electrowetting-on-dielectrics (EWOD) 8 – 10 , optical tweezers 11 13 , and Marangoni effects 14 – 16 have been presented as means of droplet control.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, analytical and numerical modeling methods must be used to better understand the details of the evaporation mechanism that is relevant for sedimenting droplets. Although modeling of free droplets does not face complexities due to substrate–droplet interactions that control the droplet shape at the solid/liquid/air interface 35,36 and Marangoni flow, 37,38 which occur in the case of sessile droplets, other factors such as evaporation-induced concentration gradients inside the droplet 39 and the possibility of crust formation on the droplet surface, 40 which are consequences of the increasing solute surface concentration during evaporation, 41 cause difficulties even in the modeling of free droplets in the presence of solutes. In addition, physical and chemical properties of the drying droplets, such as the internal viscosity, 42,43 the diffusivity of solvent and solutes in the liquid phase, 43 and the activity coefficient of the solvent, 44 are dependent on the local concentration of solutes (and, consequently, on both position and time), which makes the problem rather complex.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%