2012
DOI: 10.1007/s13258-012-0097-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Drosophila mosaic screen identifies diehard mutants as norpA P24 suppressors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The die4 mutant was previously identified as a norpA P24 suppressor from a genetic screen by using eye-specific FLP-FRT mosaic flies [31], delaying degeneration several days (Figure 1G). The die4 mutant was generated using ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS) mutagenesis, possibly bearing multiple mutations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The die4 mutant was previously identified as a norpA P24 suppressor from a genetic screen by using eye-specific FLP-FRT mosaic flies [31], delaying degeneration several days (Figure 1G). The die4 mutant was generated using ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS) mutagenesis, possibly bearing multiple mutations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Because of these complexities, we used multiple mapping methods to identify the exact mutation responsible for the suppressive phenotype of the die4 mutant. We previously reported that the mutation in the cytological region of 32D5 to E4 of the die4 chromosome, is responsible for the suppressive phenotype [31]. Although the die4 chromosome is homozygous lethal, this mutation is viable, in that the genomic deficiency, Exel6028, failed to complement the suppressive phenotype of die4 , and was still viable (Table S1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%