Plant Abiotic Stress 2013
DOI: 10.1002/9781118764374.ch2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Drought tolerance mechanisms and their molecular basis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 158 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At 56 DAT, there were no differences among cultivars, and Fv/Fm was altered by water deficit in only two cultivars. The smallest variation of this characteristic at 56 days compared with 28 DAT may have been due to the osmotic adjustment process whereby plants, under water deficit conditions, actively accumulate sugars, organic acids and ions in the cell cytosol to decrease the osmotic potential and therefore maintain the water potential and turgor of the cells near their optimum level (VERSLUES et al, 2014;LAKSMANAN;ROBINSON, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At 56 DAT, there were no differences among cultivars, and Fv/Fm was altered by water deficit in only two cultivars. The smallest variation of this characteristic at 56 days compared with 28 DAT may have been due to the osmotic adjustment process whereby plants, under water deficit conditions, actively accumulate sugars, organic acids and ions in the cell cytosol to decrease the osmotic potential and therefore maintain the water potential and turgor of the cells near their optimum level (VERSLUES et al, 2014;LAKSMANAN;ROBINSON, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We therefore can conclude that, stomata patterning is only one of the traits 511 contributing to the optimization of WUE. A large array of molecular and physiological 512 reactions is indeed known to contribute to tolerance to drought stress (Krasensky & Jonak,513 2012; Verslues et al, 2013). The close vicinity of the chromosome 2 QTL to a non-514 synonymous mutation in a gene encoding an LEA protein, known to act as a chaperone when 515 cells dehydrate, suggests one possible mechanism by which WUE might be optimized 516 independently of stomata size and density (Candat et al, 2014;Eriksson, Kutzer, Procek, 517 the presence of drought stress or in nutrient acquisition in the root are also among the 519 physiological mechanism that appear to have contributed to improve drought stress tolerance 520 in this species (Campitelli et al, 2016;Kesari et al, 2012).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many hypotheses of how plants sense water loss center on detection of mechanical stimuli generated by loss of turgor and cell shrinkage. This includes changes in membrane shape or disruption of cell wall-cell membrane connections possibly detected by proteins, such as mechanosensitive channels or receptor-like kinases that bind cell wall components (4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9). Proteins that induce or detect membrane curvature are known in mammalian cells (10) but have been little considered in plants.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%