1996
DOI: 10.1111/j.1549-0831.1996.tb00617.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Drudges, Helpers and Team Players: Oral Historical Accounts of Farm Work in Appalachian Kentucky1

Abstract: Based upon oral history interviews with 49 agriculturalists from Harlan and Letcher Counties, Kentucky, this paper documents the gender division of labor among these farm families, from the 1920s through the present. It also compares 17 wives' and husbands' accounts of farm work. While these data generally conform to patterns documented in previous sociological investigations of gender roles on family farms, a comparison of men's and women's accounts of farm work and life suggests several issues relevant to re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the initial interviewees were also identified by their connections to Cooperative Extension and for this reason these women may constitute a distinctive group. As Scott noted (), their affiliation with Extension may imply a more conventional approach to agricultural production or a more entrepreneurial ethos to agribusiness than women who are not affiliated. Last, given the small sample size it is not possible to determine if these findings represent all women farm operators.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the initial interviewees were also identified by their connections to Cooperative Extension and for this reason these women may constitute a distinctive group. As Scott noted (), their affiliation with Extension may imply a more conventional approach to agricultural production or a more entrepreneurial ethos to agribusiness than women who are not affiliated. Last, given the small sample size it is not possible to determine if these findings represent all women farm operators.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies have similarly noted that men most commonly associate their identity to the productive routines of the farmspace (Burton and Wilson 2006) and Price and Evans (2009: 8 emphasis added) eloquently observe: 'family farming may see men in the home, but not of the home'. Such findings are echoed in other contexts, with Scott's (1996) study in Kentucky noting how the discursive positioning of men as 'farmers' and farm women as 'helpers' begins to reify these gender distinctions. Such understandings are important for how we frame farming retirement.…”
Section: Retirement Place and Insidenessmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…All too often farming women restrict their legal, partnership and monetary rights to ensure farm survival and support the perceived fragility of the male farming identity (see Heather et al 2005 andEvans 2006 as Canadian andUK examples). Farming identities are usually constructed with women inheriting and reproducing an identity as 'helper', whilst men usually adopt the 'farmer' role across the life-course (Price and Evans 2005;Scott 1996). Men tend to benefit in terms of succession, ownership and power in directing the trajectory of the farm.…”
Section: Developing a Patriarchal Feminist Epistemologymentioning
confidence: 99%