2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.nano.2008.06.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Drug delivery of siRNA therapeutics: potentials and limits of nanosystems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
158
0
7

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 216 publications
(166 citation statements)
references
References 112 publications
1
158
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…3 However, progress of siRNA cancer therapy relies on the development of safe and effective delivery systems. The usage of novel nanocarriers offers substantial advantages including the prevention of degradation, possibility of delivering high concentrations of siRNA into tumor tissues, specific targeting, and controlled release.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 However, progress of siRNA cancer therapy relies on the development of safe and effective delivery systems. The usage of novel nanocarriers offers substantial advantages including the prevention of degradation, possibility of delivering high concentrations of siRNA into tumor tissues, specific targeting, and controlled release.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address these problems, two strategies have been pursued: development of noncharged and nonbiodegradable siRNA surrogates (10) and, more directly, development of delivery vehicles and strategies that would enable or enhance the entry of siRNA itself. Several siRNA delivery technologies have been reported thus far, including direct covalent conjugation of siRNA to lipids, peptides, or to aptamers; and noncovalent complexation of siRNA with polymers, biopolymers, nanotubes, lipid-based vehicles (e.g., lipopolyplexes, stable nucleic acid lipid nanoparticles), cyclodextrin polymer-based nanoparticles, fusion proteins, membrane translocation-modified magnetic nanoparticles, and antibodyprotamine conjugates (4,6,(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22).In 2000, we reported an extensive reverse engineering effort directed at the highly cationic HIV-Tat 9-mer peptide (RKKRRQRRR), showing that its ability to enter cells is related to its arginine content and, more specifically, to the number and array of its guanidinium groups (23). This finding led to the design of oligoarginine and guanidinium-rich peptoid cell penetrating agents and, subsequently, a wide range of designed nonpeptidic agents, more generally and accurately dubbed molecular transporters, differing in backbone structure but uniformly incorporating the key guanidinium head groups (24).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the major limitation for the use of siRNA in vivo is the inability of naked siRNA to passively diffuse through cellular membranes; i.e., there is a strong anionic charge of the phosphate backbone and consequent electrostatic repulsion from the anionic cell membrane surface. 4 The other obstacles to the delivery of siRNAs in vivo, such as degradation by nuclease(s) in blood and interaction with blood components, indeed exist. 5 To overcome these obstacles, many delivery systems, such as hydrodynamic approaches 6 and bioconjugating approaches including cationic liposomes, 7 cationic polymers, 8 and cell penetrating peptides, 9 have been developed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%