Drug discrimination and the analysis of private events.

Abstract

A defining feature of radical behaviorism is the explicit inclusion of private events as material phenomena within a science of behavior. Surprisingly, however, despite much theorizing, there is a notable paucity within behavior analysis of controlled experimentation and analysis of private events, especially in nonhuman animals. One technique that is amenable to the study of private events is drug discrimination. For over 40 years, drug discrimination procedures have been an incredibly effective tool providing a wealth of in vivo pharmacological information about drugs including receptor selectivity, potency, and efficacy. In addition, this procedure has provided important preclinical indications of abuse liability. However, despite its prowess as a pharmacologic tool, or perhaps because of it, empirical investigation of its parameters, procedural elements, and variants is not currently an active research domain. This review highlights the drug discrimination procedure as a powerful means to systematically investigate private events by using drugs as interoceptive stimuli. In addition to the opportunity to study privacy, empirical evaluation of the drug discrimination procedure will likely inform and improve the standard practice for future endeavors in basic and clinical pharmacology. Keywords drug discrimination; private events; radical behaviorism; behavioral pharmacology Private EventsIn his landmark paper, The Operational Analysis of Psychological Terms, Skinner (1945) defined radical behaviorism largely by the emphasized inclusion of private events within a natural science of behavior (see also Skinner, 1953;1957;1963;1974). Private events are behavioral phenomena (e.g., stimuli and responses) occurring covertly inside the skin, consisting of sensations such as pain, taste, and smell as well as behavior such as feeling, thinking, and imagining. Skinner noted that this treatment of private events is a primary point of departure of his version of radical behaviorism from the so-called methodological behaviorism which was, and continues to be, a dominant view in the behavioral sciences. He and others (

Impaired discrimination of a subanesthetic dose of ketamine in a maternal immune activation model of schizophrenia risk

“…The fundamental principle of the drug-discrimination paradigm is that the acquisition of a drug stimulus as an internal cue depends on the ability of the animal to differentiate the psychoactive state induced by the drug from their baseline subjective state (Kangas and Maguire, 2016;Preston and Bigelow, 1991). One interpretation of our main finding that MIA (but not control) animals had difficulty differentiating the internal states produced by ketamine and saline is that the baseline internal state of MIA rats resembles the state induced by intermediate doses of ketamine.…”

The instrumental role of operant paradigms in translational psychiatric research: Insights from a maternal immune activation model of schizophrenia risk

“…We suggest that our results strongly indicate that the subjective internal state experienced by MIA rats is similar to that experienced in human psychosis. These results provide a methodological basis for exploring the impact of MIA on subjective internal states and related behavioral phenomena such as human psychosis, and could provide means for better understanding neurobiological or molecular mechanisms of this phenomenon as it relates to schizophrenia (Kangas & Maguire, 2016).…”

Developing Improved Translational Models of Pain: A Role for the Behavioral Scientist

“…Indeed, notwithstanding copious conceptual and theoretical treatises, there have been relatively few controlled laboratory studies examining private events. One exception that has proven fruitful is the use of behavioral techniques to bring operant behavior under the control of interoceptive events produced by drug treatment, with drug discrimination being one of the most prominent examples (reviewed in Kangas & Maguire, 2016). Other studies have used drug treatment in human subjects to produce equivalence relations between interoceptive (drug) and exteroceptive (visual) stimuli (DeGrandpre, Bickel, & Higgins, 1992) and in pigeons to model interpersonal communication of private events produced by distinctive interoceptive effects associated with different drug classes (Lubinski & Thompson, 1987).…”