2005
DOI: 10.1517/14656566.6.13.2231
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Drug–drug interactions of antifungal agents and implications for patient care

Abstract: Drug interactions in the gastrointestinal tract, liver and kidneys result from alterations in pH, ionic complexation, and interference with membrane transport proteins and enzymatic processes involved in intestinal absorption, enteric and hepatic metabolism, renal filtration and excretion. Azole antifungals can be involved in drug interactions at all the sites, by one or more of the above mechanisms. Consequently, azoles interact with a vast array of compounds. Drug-drug interactions associated with amphoteric… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
43
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
2
43
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In spite of the clinical application of four classes of antimycotics against systemic candidiasis, there have been continuous efforts to discover and develop new antimycotic compounds, as existing drugs may be associated with toxic side-effects or interactions with other therapeutics, high costs and resistance development (Gubbins and Amsden, 2005;Vermes et al, 2000). Beside the screening for compounds with fungicidal or fungistatic activity and the description of novel potential antimycotic therapeutics (reviewed by Calugi et al (2011)), the recent years also saw the development of novel approaches to the search for antifungal agents (for example BurgerKentischer et al, 2011;Lafleur et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In spite of the clinical application of four classes of antimycotics against systemic candidiasis, there have been continuous efforts to discover and develop new antimycotic compounds, as existing drugs may be associated with toxic side-effects or interactions with other therapeutics, high costs and resistance development (Gubbins and Amsden, 2005;Vermes et al, 2000). Beside the screening for compounds with fungicidal or fungistatic activity and the description of novel potential antimycotic therapeutics (reviewed by Calugi et al (2011)), the recent years also saw the development of novel approaches to the search for antifungal agents (for example BurgerKentischer et al, 2011;Lafleur et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Busulphan levels are likely to be elevated 44 Cimetidine CSA trough levels increased 50-80%. 44,51 Monitor and reduce CSA dose by 50%. 45 Effect persists for some time after cessation of itraconazole 44,51 CSA AUC increased 70%.…”
Section: Azolesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…44,51 Monitor and reduce CSA dose by 50%. 45 Effect persists for some time after cessation of itraconazole 44,51 CSA AUC increased 70%. Interaction likely (ketoconazole inhibits activation of ifosphamide); monitor for efficacy 49,53 Interaction possible (ketoconazole inhibits activation of ifosphamide); monitor for efficacy 49,53 51,56 Administer with cola beverage 45 Omeprazole level doubled; recommend omeprazole dose reduction.…”
Section: Azolesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations