1999
DOI: 10.1007/s002280050673
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Drug-drug interactions of new active substances: mibefradil example

Abstract: The most important points revealed by this analysis were: (1) when interpreting the results of interaction studies, it is important to consider not only the mean of the interaction effect but also the observed and the theoretically conceivable extreme effects in individual subjects and (2) a drug with a high interaction potential may represent a high risk even if an adequate warning is included in the product information. The need for specific pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interaction studies with new dr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
37
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Mibefradil was approved for use in essential hypertension and stable angina pectoris until it was withdrawn from the market due to drug-drug interactions leading to irregular heart rhythms (219). Submicromolar concentrations of mibefradil, formerly Ro-40 -5967, preferentially block T-type channels, while higher concentrations are required to block cardiovascular L-type channels (282).…”
Section: A Antihypertensivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mibefradil was approved for use in essential hypertension and stable angina pectoris until it was withdrawn from the market due to drug-drug interactions leading to irregular heart rhythms (219). Submicromolar concentrations of mibefradil, formerly Ro-40 -5967, preferentially block T-type channels, while higher concentrations are required to block cardiovascular L-type channels (282).…”
Section: A Antihypertensivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies with mibefradil, a non-DHP blocker specific for T-type Ca 2 þ channels, have implied that selective inhibition of T-type Ca 2 þ channels is advantageous in the treatment of hypertension or angina pectoris (Hermsmeyer et al, 1997;Van der Vring et al, 1999). However, mibefradil was withdrawn from the market because of serious pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions with other drugs frequently administered to patients with cardiovascular diseases (Krayenbuhl et al, 1999). Therefore, the development of a new T-type Ca 2 þ channel blocker without adverse effects has been considered necessary for medication.…”
Section: T Furukawa Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After being marketed, however, the drug generated an unexpectedly high incidence of serious adverse reactions, such as bradyarrhythmias with ␤-blockers or rhabdomyolysis with statins, resulting from interactions. [3][4][5] It is self-evident that an adverse effect that occurs rarely (eg, once in several thousand patients) may be entirely undetected in a premarketing experience; indeed, one case of an unusual adverse effect before marketing may well go unrecognized. Nevertheless, such adverse effects, once recognized, may be so alarming as to result in the withdrawal of a drug; examples involve agents that produce hepatotoxicity 6 or marked QT prolongation and torsades de pointes.…”
Section: What Is Not Known About a Drug When It Is Marketed?mentioning
confidence: 99%