2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2006.11.158
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Drug eluting stents may not be the answer for myocardial bridges

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although coronary stenting was shown to abolish ischemic symptoms, we found a high rate of in-stent restenosis with bare metal stents deployed in segments with MB [6]. This finding was supported by other studies including drug eluting stents [7,8]. We speculated that in-stent restenosis which were diffuse in most of the patients might have been due to vasoactive substances released from the vessel wall squeezed between the stent and the myocardium in each contraction, so called "sandwich effect" [6].…”
supporting
confidence: 88%
“…Although coronary stenting was shown to abolish ischemic symptoms, we found a high rate of in-stent restenosis with bare metal stents deployed in segments with MB [6]. This finding was supported by other studies including drug eluting stents [7,8]. We speculated that in-stent restenosis which were diffuse in most of the patients might have been due to vasoactive substances released from the vessel wall squeezed between the stent and the myocardium in each contraction, so called "sandwich effect" [6].…”
supporting
confidence: 88%
“…Even though coronary stent is capable of suppressing ischemic symptoms, there is a high rate of in-stent restenosis with stents implanted in segments with myocardial bridge [40]. This finding was corroborated by other studies, including pharmacological stents [41,42]. It is speculated that the in-stent restenosis, which was diffuse in most patients, may be due to vasoactive substances released from the vessel wall, squeezed between the stent and the myocardium, at each contraction [40].…”
Section: Clinical-surgical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…This view may not be shared by all cardiologists [ 38 , 39 ] because one can object that the stent is implanted in such a manner as to cover also the whole tunneled segment. But stenting of bridges was shown to be associated with high restenosis rates [ 5 , 40 - 42 ]. Thus, it might turn out in the future that only surgery can suppress both ischemia and the progression of atherosclerosis in the proximal epicardial segment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%