2016
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw168
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Drug-induced adverse events prediction with the LINCS L1000 data

Abstract: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
206
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 165 publications
(208 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
2
206
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We found a substantially higher rate of positives in the list produced by a pathway‐level PDN approach: 54%, compared to 27% for the gene‐level approach, and 16% for randomly selected drugs. We also obtained up‐ and down‐regulated DEGs from the BarCode method (McCall et al , ; Table EV4), an approach that categorizes gene expression as on or off, and used these genes, as well as the standard DEG list to query the LINCS database (Wang et al , ), a greatly expanded version of CMap (Lamb et al , ). The lists of compounds expected to have a positive effect on sepsis mortality (i.e., up‐ and down‐regulated in adults compared to children) were also curated to assess the frequency of prior positive results in the literature.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We found a substantially higher rate of positives in the list produced by a pathway‐level PDN approach: 54%, compared to 27% for the gene‐level approach, and 16% for randomly selected drugs. We also obtained up‐ and down‐regulated DEGs from the BarCode method (McCall et al , ; Table EV4), an approach that categorizes gene expression as on or off, and used these genes, as well as the standard DEG list to query the LINCS database (Wang et al , ), a greatly expanded version of CMap (Lamb et al , ). The lists of compounds expected to have a positive effect on sepsis mortality (i.e., up‐ and down‐regulated in adults compared to children) were also curated to assess the frequency of prior positive results in the literature.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our experiments show that CS is a robust predictor of side effects. The base MLP model, which uses CS features as input, produces ∼11% macro-AUC and ∼2% micro-AUC improvement over the state-of-the-art results provided in [32], which uses both GEX (high quality) and CS features. The multi-modal neural network model, which uses CS, GEX and META features and uses summation in the fusion layer (MMNN.Sum) achieves 0.79 macro-AUC and 0.877 micro-AUC which is the best result among MLP based approaches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…and are not cell or condition (i.e., dosage) specific. To address this issue, Wang et al (2016) utilize the data from the LINCS L1000 project [32]. This project profiles gene expression changes in numerous human cell lines after treating them with a large number of drugs and small-molecule compounds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3 This comprehensive profiling provided by L1000 is widely used in drug discovery and repurposing, largely facilitating large scale pharmacology analysis. 4,5 L1000 assay measures the expression of 978 landmark genes with The Luminex FlexMap 3D platform, which can identify 500 different bead color as tags for different genes. To measure all landmark genes within one scan, L1000 separately coupled two different gene barcodes to aliquots of the same bead color and mixed them with a ratio of 2:1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%