2002
DOI: 10.1002/jps.10051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Drug interactions between HIV protease inhibitors based on physiologically-based pharmacokinetic model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite anatomical differences between humans and rats, the oral bioavailability of SQV in the two species is similar, both low (4%) and variable (Roche Laboratories, 2001;Shibata et al, 2002). Perhaps this similarity is due to the structural and functional similarity between rodent Mdr1, Mrp2, and CYP3A and their human counterparts (i.e., MDR1, MRP2, and CYP3A4) (Schinkel, 1997b;König et al, 1999;Bogaards et al, 2000), thus making the rat a relevant model for investigating SQV oral bioavailability in humans.…”
Section: Usansky Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite anatomical differences between humans and rats, the oral bioavailability of SQV in the two species is similar, both low (4%) and variable (Roche Laboratories, 2001;Shibata et al, 2002). Perhaps this similarity is due to the structural and functional similarity between rodent Mdr1, Mrp2, and CYP3A and their human counterparts (i.e., MDR1, MRP2, and CYP3A4) (Schinkel, 1997b;König et al, 1999;Bogaards et al, 2000), thus making the rat a relevant model for investigating SQV oral bioavailability in humans.…”
Section: Usansky Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The parameters were determined based on the concentrations of metabolites equivalent to SQV; n ϭ 3 to 7 rats/group. (Shibata et al, 2002). Moderate amounts of metabolites (1 Ϫ F gut ϭ ϳ20%) seen in the mesenteric and portal circulation indicate that SQV intestinal metabolism is a not significant factor in its low oral bioavailability.…”
Section: Usansky Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SQV and NFV, the most effective PIs in attenuating neutrophil functions, caused a significant inhibition of apoptosis, while APV had only small effects on neutrophil functions and on neutrophil apoptosis. The concentrations of the PIs used in this study are readily achievable with oral dosing regimens in humans (46,51). The PIs act by blocking the HIV aspartyl protease, a viral enzyme that cleaves the HIV Gag and Gag-Pol polyprotein backbone, thereby interrupting the viral life cycle.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…31,32) In our previous studies on pharmacokinetic interactions among the HIV PIs currently used in clinical therapy, we observed that IDV inhibited the metabolism of APV, NFV and SQV with K i values of 0.67, 2.76 and 3.55 mM, respectively. [10][11][12][13] After oral administration of APV, SQV or NFV with IDV, their AUC values in the presence of IDV were increased 1.6-, 9.5-and 2.3-fold, respectively, compared with any of them alone. On the other hand, the AUC values of APV, SQV and NFV after intravenous co-administration with IDV increased by 1.4-, 1.2-and 1.5-fold, respectively, and showed no notable increase compared to those obtained from oral administration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7][8][9] According to the previous studies, the degrees of in vivo pharmacokinetic interaction between any combination of two drugs selected out of the above five were highly variable. [10][11][12] Even though IDV had the strongest inhibitory effect on APV metabolism in rat liver microsomes, the in vivo effects of an HIV PI after co-administration with IDV could not always be predicted from in vitro results, suggesting the presence of another interaction process besides metabolism in the liver. 13) It has been suggested that in some drugs the role of intestinal metabolism is greater than that of hepatic metabolism in the overall first-pass effect.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%