2002
DOI: 10.1093/milmed/167.5.379
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Drug-Positive Rates for the Army from Fiscal Years 1991 to 2000 and for the National Guard from Fiscal Years 1997 to 2000

Abstract: This article examines the positive rate by drug for all urinalysis specimens tested by the U.S. Army from fiscal year 1991 (FY91) to FY00 and for the Army National Guard (NG) from FY97 to FY00. The average positive rate for the Army from FY91 to FY00 was 0.84%. In FY00, the Army rate reached a 10-year high of 1.04%. From FY97 to FY00, the NG positive rate declined from 3.4% to 2.16% but was significantly (p < 0.05) higher than the Army rate during the same period. Marijuana and cocaine are the most abused drug… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…None the less, younger age, lower education and lower perception of risk associated with drug use were the major predictors of drug use in the US army [39,40]. As observed among IDF releasees, marijuana is the most commonly used drug among US military personnel, accounting for 75–83% of use [40–42].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…None the less, younger age, lower education and lower perception of risk associated with drug use were the major predictors of drug use in the US army [39,40]. As observed among IDF releasees, marijuana is the most commonly used drug among US military personnel, accounting for 75–83% of use [40–42].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much of the research on child abuse (17)(18)(19), spouse abuse (9,11,20,21), and substance abuse (8,(22)(23)(24) in the military has focused on these problems separately, but the co-occurrence of these problems has been well-established in civilian studies (25). For the purpose of this research, co-occurrence was defined in two ways: (1) spouse abuse and child abuse that occur in the same family and (2) substance abuse by a soldier who is a spouse-abuse or child-abuse offender.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%