1998
DOI: 10.1177/004947559802800220
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Drug Resistant Enterococci in a South Indian Hospital

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

4
11
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
4
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This has been reported in earlier studies as well. 7,15 In our study, the highest resistance was seen against erythromycin, which is in agreement with other studies carried out in India. 16,17 In this study, occurrence of HLGR was 86.6% amongst the total Enterococcal isolates, being higher in E. faecium isolates as compared to E. faecalis although the difference was not statistically significant (P 0.294).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This has been reported in earlier studies as well. 7,15 In our study, the highest resistance was seen against erythromycin, which is in agreement with other studies carried out in India. 16,17 In this study, occurrence of HLGR was 86.6% amongst the total Enterococcal isolates, being higher in E. faecium isolates as compared to E. faecalis although the difference was not statistically significant (P 0.294).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This disparity in resistance rate might be because of differences in strain properties, sample size, sex, age or even methods of studies. Overall resistance to antibiotics was higher among E. faecium rather than E. faecalis, which is in agreement with other reports (Bhat et al, 1998;Fernandes & Dhanashree, 2013;Mendiratta et al, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…According to the results of the present study the prevalence of E. faecalis among infectious clinical samples was about 2 fold higher than E. faecium, similar results have been reported from other studies in Iran (Jabalameli et al, 2009;Sharifi et al, 2013), Malaysia (Sharifi et al, 2013), central and south India (Bhat, Paul, & Ananthakrishna, 1998;Fernandes & Dhanashree, 2013;Mendiratta et al, 2008); while in some other studies the prevalence of E. faecium has been reported higher than E. faecalis (Kapoor, Randhawa, & Deb, 2005). Fernandes and Dhanashree (2013) suggested that possessing the hemolysin and gelatinase might be the reason of higher prevalence of E. faecalis in infectious samples (Fernandes & Dhanashree, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The distribution of ratio of E. faecalis to E. faecium is similar to the study conducted by other authors. 4,[11][12][13][14] According to study conducted by Marothi et al, most frequent infections caused by enterococci are urinary tract infections followed by infections of intra-abdominal and pelvic abscesses or post-surgery wound infections whereas in our study most of the Enterococcal isolates were isolated from urine (44%), Pus (51%) and others specimen (5%, which includes blood 80% and drain tube 20%). 15 These results were similar to the results conducted by Sanal et al, were the maximum number of isolates was obtained from urine.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%