2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10067-021-05609-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Drug retention of sarilumab, baricitinib, and tofacitinib in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: the ANSWER cohort study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
5
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this analysis, primary nonresponse was the main reason for discontinuation, irrespective of treatment with baricitinib or any other tsDMARD or any bDMARD. This finding is consistent with reports from the USA [ 9 ], Japan [ 30 , 31 ], and previous database searches [ 12 ], where the loss of efficacy or lack of effectiveness were the key reasons for discontinuations among patients receiving bDMARDs and/or tsDMARDs. Of note, in the current study, the proportion with primary nonresponse was 3.3% for baricitinib-treated patients and 5.8% for patients treated with another tsDMARD or any bDMARD.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In this analysis, primary nonresponse was the main reason for discontinuation, irrespective of treatment with baricitinib or any other tsDMARD or any bDMARD. This finding is consistent with reports from the USA [ 9 ], Japan [ 30 , 31 ], and previous database searches [ 12 ], where the loss of efficacy or lack of effectiveness were the key reasons for discontinuations among patients receiving bDMARDs and/or tsDMARDs. Of note, in the current study, the proportion with primary nonresponse was 3.3% for baricitinib-treated patients and 5.8% for patients treated with another tsDMARD or any bDMARD.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…From a total of 2961 references (after de-duplication), 226 were selected for a full-text review and 59 observational studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria 16–74. In addition, 2 RCTs with a primary safety outcome,2 3 and 28 RCTs/LTEs from the efficacy SLR,75–102 were included (flow chart in online supplemental figure S1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of 59 observational studies, 51 assessed only 1 outcome,16–66 and 8 addressed ≥2 outcomes (online supplemental table S1–137). 67–74 Of 27 studies evaluating the risk of infections,27–47 67 69 71–74 23 included patients on bDMARDs,27–29 31–33 35–37 39–47 69 71–74 9 of which also patients on JAKi,27 28 30 31 42 45 69 71 72 3 only patients on csDMARDs34 38 67 and 1 patients either on tofacitinib or on csDMARDs 30.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Kansai Consortium for Well-being of Rheumatic Disease Patients (ANSWER) cohort is an observational, multicenter registry of patients with RA in the Kansai district of Japan [7][8][9][10][11][12]. Data were retrospectively collected from patients who were examined at seven major university-related hospitals (Kyoto University, Osaka University, Osaka Medical College, Kansai Medical University, Kobe University, Nara Medial University and Osaka Red Cross Hospital).…”
Section: Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The performance of bDMARDs has increasingly been investigated through recent cohort-based observational studies [3,4] in which drug retention is considered a major index of both treatment safety and effectiveness [5,6]. We have recently reported the drug retention rates of bDMARDs [7][8][9][10][11][12], factors affecting the e cacy of bDMARDs [13,14] and factors affecting the achievement of bDMARDs-free remission [15] on the basis of ndings from our cohort. The aim of the present multicenter, retrospective study is to clarify the factors affecting drug retention of a JAKi (BAR or TOF) in real-world settings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%