2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2011.09.063
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Drug targeting to tumors: Principles, pitfalls and (pre-) clinical progress

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
778
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,166 publications
(787 citation statements)
references
References 97 publications
6
778
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In spite of the development in diagnostic and therapeutic methods, the outcome after treatment remains poor mainly because of the potential of tumor cells to invade and metastasize (Rasheed et al, 2010;Deng et al, 2014;Huang et al, 2014). Targeted therapies are commonly used in combination with traditional chemotherapy currently (Liloglou et al, 2014), and targeted drugs are more effective and have less severe side effects than standard chemotherapy drugs (Lammers et al, 2012). Under these circumstances, discovery of novel and effective biomarkers for lung cancer diagnosis and prognosis as well as new therapeutic targets becomes imperative.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In spite of the development in diagnostic and therapeutic methods, the outcome after treatment remains poor mainly because of the potential of tumor cells to invade and metastasize (Rasheed et al, 2010;Deng et al, 2014;Huang et al, 2014). Targeted therapies are commonly used in combination with traditional chemotherapy currently (Liloglou et al, 2014), and targeted drugs are more effective and have less severe side effects than standard chemotherapy drugs (Lammers et al, 2012). Under these circumstances, discovery of novel and effective biomarkers for lung cancer diagnosis and prognosis as well as new therapeutic targets becomes imperative.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ideally, nanomedicines should circulate, extravasate (in case of IV injection), accumulate and finally penetrate into the tumor. Unlike for IV administration, where tens of studies investigated the biodistribution and ability of different nanomedicines to accumulate at tumor sites [58,59], only (very) limited data are available on the biodistribution of NPs following IP injection (table 1). The biodistribution of non-PEGylated (450 nm in size) and PEGylated (30-100 nm in size) graphene oxide NPs was assessed in healthy animals following IP administration [60].…”
Section: Biodistribution Of Nps Following Ip Injectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, subcutaneously injected tumor in rodents can grow up to ±1 cm within few weeks, if this is related to the human tumors, it represents ±20 cm tumor growth. [8] As the tumor growth is more rapid in murine tumor models, blood vessels are not developed properly, instead are highly vascularized and leaky, simple stromal structure with low density, whereas in humans all tumor vessels are not necessarily leaky, highly dense stroma, which leads to heterogeneous distribution. Nevertheless, although preclinical studies from murine tumor models are consistent, yet insufficient to correlate the clinical outcome in human patients.…”
Section: Epr In Humansmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2][3][4][5][6][7] The application of nanotechnology in cancer therapy, herein referred as cancer nanomedicines, have received wide spread attention due to the unique physicochemical properties of the nanoparticles with the ability to deliver different therapeutics (e.g., chemotherapeutics and biologics), altering their pharmacokinetic profiles, augmenting their accumulation in the tumors and reducing their toxicity profiles. [8][9][10][11] Nanomedicines aim to improve the balance between therapeutic efficacy and systemic toxicity of conventional chemotherapeutic agents, which lack of specificity, thereby enhancing the therapeutic index of the anticancer drugs. In clinical cancer care more evidences have been suggested that nanoparticles found to be localized in solid tumors after the systemic (intravenous) administration of nanomedicines to cancer patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%