1984
DOI: 10.1001/archpsyc.1983.01790220086014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Drug Therapy in the Prevention of Recurrences in Unipolar and Bipolar Affective Disorders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
134
3
1

Year Published

1986
1986
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 551 publications
(142 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
4
134
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Tricyclic antidepressant mono or adjunctive maintenance therapy is not recommended due to an increased risk of manic switch (level 2 negative)398, 399, 400 (Table 18). …”
Section: Maintenance Therapy For Bipolar Disordermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tricyclic antidepressant mono or adjunctive maintenance therapy is not recommended due to an increased risk of manic switch (level 2 negative)398, 399, 400 (Table 18). …”
Section: Maintenance Therapy For Bipolar Disordermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is not an insignificant problem since recurrence rates vary from 15 to 40% in long-term clinical trials, a proportion mirrored in clinical practice (Coppen et al, 1978;Prien et al, 1973Prien et al, , 1984Montgomery et al, 1988;Rouillon et al, 1989;Frank et al, 1990;Doogan and Caillard, 1992;Kupfer et al, 1992;Montgomery and Dunbar, 1993). Patients who relapse in spite of continuing their treatment may be demoralized and refuse further treatment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, two studies have reported that lithium and imipramine have comparable efficacy in the prevention of recurrence (Glen et al 1981;Prien et al 1984) whereas one study has shown imipramine to be superior to lithium in long term maintenance treatment of unipolar depression (Frank et al 1990). The difference in conclusions reached by these various studies may be explained by several factors including, as Prien et al (1984) have noted, differences in the patients studied. In those reports in which lithium was shown to be superior to a cyclic antidepressant, patients were more stable at the point of entry into the study and had been episode free for at least 7 to 12 months.…”
Section: Maintenance Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…To date, three studies have shown that lithium is superior to a heterocyclic antidepressant in the prevention of recurrence (Coppen et al 1976b; Kane et al 1982;. On the other hand, two studies have reported that lithium and imipramine have comparable efficacy in the prevention of recurrence (Glen et al 1981;Prien et al 1984) whereas one study has shown imipramine to be superior to lithium in long term maintenance treatment of unipolar depression (Frank et al 1990). The difference in conclusions reached by these various studies may be explained by several factors including, as Prien et al (1984) have noted, differences in the patients studied.…”
Section: Maintenance Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%