2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0376-8716(99)00066-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Drug use, self report and urinalysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, denial may play a role in both the CAGE-AID and the clinical interview. And although there is evidence for the validity of the self-report method for the assessment of adolescent substance use (Winters, Stinchfield, Henly, and Schwartz, 1990), the use of a selective two-stage screening process, employing biological indicators such as urinalysis, is always recommended when in doubt about the presence or (excessive) use of substances (Kilpatrick, Howlett, Sedgwick, and Ghodse, 2000).…”
Section: Study's Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, denial may play a role in both the CAGE-AID and the clinical interview. And although there is evidence for the validity of the self-report method for the assessment of adolescent substance use (Winters, Stinchfield, Henly, and Schwartz, 1990), the use of a selective two-stage screening process, employing biological indicators such as urinalysis, is always recommended when in doubt about the presence or (excessive) use of substances (Kilpatrick, Howlett, Sedgwick, and Ghodse, 2000).…”
Section: Study's Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Along similar lines, studies investigating the prevalence of drug abuse in various populations have also demonstrated a lack of concordance between patient's self-report and actual drug use status based on objective measurements, such as urine toxicology screens (Chermack et al, 2000;Ehrman, Robbins, & Cornish, 1997;Fendrich, Johnson, Wislar, Hubbell, & Spiehler, 2004;Kilpatrick, Howlett, Sedgwick, & Ghodse, 2000;Lu, Taylor, & Riley, 2001;Tassiopoulos et al, 2004). Given that drug-using individuals appear to under-report the frequency and quantity of their drug use in some circumstances, urinalysis was used to measure recent drug use in the current investigation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The research in this area is equivocal. A number of recent studies using objectively measured data, such as urinalysis, along with self-report measures of recent stimulant drug-use, found poor concordance between these measures (Chermack et al, 2000;Ehrman et al, 1997;Fendrich et al, 2004;Kilpatrick, Howlett, Sedgwick, & Ghodse, 2000; Lu, Taylor, Bruce, & Riley, 200;Tassiopoulos et al, 2004). However, others have reported a reasonable degree of concordance between self reported and objectively measured stimulant drug use (Darke, 1998;Yacoubian, & Urbach, 2002), especially when subjects are not seeking actual drug use/abuse treatment (Elman et al, 2000).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%