Theoretical work in critical medical anthropology and biomedicine on substance use in pregnancy has yet to develop a cohesive framework of the maternal-fetal unit (MFU) as a dynamic object. As a result, patient history, risk, and agency continue to be driven by an Enlightenment-era, monolithic conception of individual will. I use the example of Carla, a young woman actively using heroin in her pregnancy, to illustrate the limits of the MFU as it is currently conceived. By using critiques of subjective utilitiarianism, as discussed by Byron Good, and the concept of becoming, as elucidated by Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari, this article seeks to articulate an ethics of accompaniment, focused on both individual patient care and wider sociopolitical advocacy. These ethics help to redefine the MFU, and support new and unique ways of providing services to this often marginalized and vulnerable population.Keywords substance abuse, pregnancy, becoming, assemblage, prenatal care
Medicine Anthropology Theory
29Make maps, not photos or drawings.-Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari A Thousand Plateaus (1987,(24)(25) Clinical epistemology: From critical medical anthropology to physician advocacy in the care of substance use in pregnancyThe importance of anthropological theory in biomedical practice has been a topic of discussion over the past three decades (see, for example, Christman and Johnson 1996;Kleinman 1985;Kleinman and Benson 2006). This discourse has created an epistemological space within biomedicine in which to focus on the social and political construction of care, particularly among marginalized and vulnerable populations. The effect of critical medical anthropology -particularly its primary engagement with biomedical institutions' power and control -on clinical practice has been felt in a variety of ways, from HIV/AIDS care in Haiti (Farmer 1992) to understanding chronic illness and pain among migrant farmworkers in the United States (Holmes 2013).In particular, the role of the physician as a 'public citizen', engaged in the care of an entire community, rather than only an individual, sheds a new light on the ethical requirements of biomedical care (Gruen, Pearson, and Brennan 2004). Physician advocacy, defined as 'action by a physician to promote those social, economic, educational, and political changes that ameliorate the suffering and threats to human health and wellbeing that he or she identifies through his or her professional work and expertise ' (Earnest, Wong, and Federico 2010, 63), is a direct response to the ethical obligations of a physician as a public citizen. Indeed, in line with critical medical anthropology's goals for creating a new medical order committed to understanding and undoing inequality as experienced through health disparities, physician advocacy takes up this torch on a political, educational, and clinical level (see Metzl and Hansen 2014). Moving towards 'viable institutional practices ' (Quesada, Hart, and Bourgois 2011, 351) created by structurally competent physicia...