2020
DOI: 10.1111/anae.15295
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: an abridged Cochrane network meta‐analysis

Abstract: Postoperative nausea and vomiting is a common adverse effect of anaesthesia. Although dozens of different anti-emetics are available for clinical practice, there is currently no comparative ranking of efficacy and safety of these drugs to inform clinical practice. We performed a systematic review with network meta-analyses to compare, and rank in terms of efficacy and safety, single anti-emetic drugs and their combinations, including 5hydroxytryptamine 3 , dopamine-2 and neurokinin-1 receptor antagonists; cort… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
45
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
45
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…As PONV or POV involves many different pathological pathways, multimodal approach with combination of pharmacological and nonpharmacological prophylaxis along with interventions is generally employed in patients with high PONV risk to reduce baseline risk [ 22 ]. Although many new antiemetic agents have been introduced and provided considerable beneficial effects, there is still considerable lack of evidence regarding safety aspects that does warrant investigation [ 23 ]. Recently, genetic study for PONV revealed that the CHRM3 polymorphism and the Apfel score independently predict PONV susceptibility and suggested that dexamethasone/acustimulation should be considered in patients with low Apfel score but at high genetic risk [ 24 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As PONV or POV involves many different pathological pathways, multimodal approach with combination of pharmacological and nonpharmacological prophylaxis along with interventions is generally employed in patients with high PONV risk to reduce baseline risk [ 22 ]. Although many new antiemetic agents have been introduced and provided considerable beneficial effects, there is still considerable lack of evidence regarding safety aspects that does warrant investigation [ 23 ]. Recently, genetic study for PONV revealed that the CHRM3 polymorphism and the Apfel score independently predict PONV susceptibility and suggested that dexamethasone/acustimulation should be considered in patients with low Apfel score but at high genetic risk [ 24 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1). Figure 2 is a more complex example, taken from the review by Weibel et al [9], although the principles are the same. It shows the network geometry of eligible comparisons for PONV within 24 h of surgery.…”
Section: Network Meta-analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 2 Network geometry of eligible comparisons for postoperative vomiting within 24 h after surgery. Reproduced from [9]. aprepitant, and also argues for the replacement of less effective drugs such as metoclopramide.…”
Section: Clinical Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, an abridged Cochrane network meta-analysis of 585 studies that compared various drugs for prevention of PONV was published in November 2020. 30 The RR for incidence of PONV when used as a single agent was reported as the following (in order of highest to lowest efficacy): 0.06 to 0.56 for NK1 receptor antagonists, 0.44 to 0.62 for 5-HT 3 antagonists, 0.51 for dexamethasone, 0.53 to 0.55 for antihistamines, 0.61 for scopolamine, and 0.61 to 0.73 for dopamine antagonists. Among the individual dopamine antagonists, the following RR were found (in order of highest to lowest efficacy): 0.61 for haloperidol, 0.61 for droperidol, 0.71 for amisulpride, and 0.73 for metoclopramide.…”
Section: Drug Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%