2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtos.2015.12.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dry Eye Profiles in Patients with a Positive Elevated Surface Matrix Metalloproteinase 9 Point-of-Care Test Versus Negative Patients

Abstract: Purpose To compare dry eye (DE) symptoms and signs in subjects who tested positive versus those who tested negative for ocular surface matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP-9) using the InflammaDry point of care test (RPS, Sarasota, FL). Methods In this cross-sectional study, individuals seen in the Miami Veterans Affairs eye clinic with DE symptoms, as evidenced by DE questionnaire 5 (DEQ5) ≥6, were given standardized questionnaires to assess DE symptoms and ocular and non-ocular pain complaints. Also, a complete… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
46
3
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
46
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Thirty-nine percent were positive for elevated levels of MMP-9. No statistical difference was found in the symptoms or signs of dry eye patients that tested positive or negative for elevated MMP-9 22. Thus, it is not possible to identify patients who have ocular inflammation based on a profile of their symptoms or signs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Thirty-nine percent were positive for elevated levels of MMP-9. No statistical difference was found in the symptoms or signs of dry eye patients that tested positive or negative for elevated MMP-9 22. Thus, it is not possible to identify patients who have ocular inflammation based on a profile of their symptoms or signs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Most dry eye testing methods such as tear breakup time (TBUT), Schirmer tear testing, tear osmolarity, and diagnostic imaging methods such as inferometry, meibomography, corneal topography, and ocular coherence tomography provide valuable information to help characterize patients as evaporative or aqueous deficient but cannot predict which patients have clinically significant ocular surface inflammation 22. However, the presence of corneal and/or conjunctival staining with a vital dye is a clinical indicator of inflammation and directly correlates to the levels of inflammatory mediators and MMP-9.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…70 Using a quantitative immunobead assay, tear MMP-9 concentration was directly correlated to tear osmolarity and inversely correlated to Schirmer test scores that are a measure of tear production. 71 In a study measuring tear MMP-9 activity rather than concentration, MMP-9 activity increased with categorical severity of tear dysfunction using the Dry Eye Workshop (DEWS) criteria and tear MMP-9 activities showed significant positive correlation with symptom severity scores, corneal and conjunctival fluorescein staining, topographic surface regularity index and percentage area of abnormal superficial corneal epithelia measured by confocal microscopy, and inverse correlation with low-contrast visual acuity and fluorescein tear break-up time.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19 While there are no currently available clinical assays to measure MMP-9 activity, there is an approved point-of-care MMP-9 tear immunoassay that detects levels of MMP-9 about a certain threshold. 43,44 In one clinical series, this test was positive in 39% of patients experiencing ocular irritation; however, a positive result did not correlate with severity of ocular surface dye staining, so this test it may prove to be useful method to identify higher levels of ocular surface inflammation in symptomatic patients. 44 …”
Section: Grading Severity Of Ocular Surface Diseasementioning
confidence: 98%