Dry needling perceptions and experiences: A survey of Australian physiotherapists
Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Cited by 4 publications
References 31 publications
Global trends and performance of dry needling from 2004 to 2024: a bibliometric analysis
BackgroundMany doctors are incorporating dry needling into their clinical practice. Despite this growing trend, there has not been a comprehensive bibliometric analysis conducted in this field. Thus, this study aims to investigate the current research landscape, key research contributors, and popular research topics in dry needling, and to analyze the developmental trends within this area of study.MethodsThe study utilized the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) as the main data source. Scientific literature was gathered through title (TI) searches for original clinical research papers on dry needling published between 2004 and 2024, using ‘dry needling’ or ‘dry needle’ as the search term. Statistical analyses and visualizations of the literature information, such as keywords, countries, research institutions, and authors, were conducted using the bibliometric.com online platform and VOSviewer. This approach aimed to statistically analyze and visualize the key research entities, hotspots, and frontiers in dry needling research. Additionally, the study delved into collaborative networks, research outputs, hot topics, and trends within the field of dry needling.ResultsThis investigation encompassed 468 publications, with the year 2021 topping the charts for the highest publication output, amassing a total of 271 articles. The journal “Acupuncture in Medicine” emerged as the most frequently cited publication. The most impactful article was titled “Acupuncture and dry-needling for low back pain: An updated systematic review within the framework of the Cochrane Collaboration.” Spain took the lead as the most productive country in this domain, with the United States closely following. Cesar Fernández-de-las-Peñas emerged as the most prolific author in the field. The Universidad Rey Juan Carlos in Spain was recognized as the most productive institution for research in dry needling. As for journal keywords, “dry needling,” “trigger point,” and “myofascial pain syn-drome” were the triumvirate of terms most recurrently encountered.ConclusionThe field of dry needling research has witnessed significant growth in recent years, characterized by the emergence of novel trends such as comparative studies with acupuncture, exploration into the mechanisms of action, and a transition toward interdisciplinary approaches. As medical models evolve, the focus is expanding from the exclusive treatment of muscle pain to broader applications. Despite this progress, the domain is underscored by a paucity of large-scale, multicenter clinical trials and animal studies. There exists an imperative for enhanced collaboration among academic and research institutions. A more profound exploration and comprehensive research endeavors are essential to enhance our understanding and broaden the clinical application of dry needling techniques.
Global trends and performance of dry needling from 2004 to 2024: a bibliometric analysis
BackgroundMany doctors are incorporating dry needling into their clinical practice. Despite this growing trend, there has not been a comprehensive bibliometric analysis conducted in this field. Thus, this study aims to investigate the current research landscape, key research contributors, and popular research topics in dry needling, and to analyze the developmental trends within this area of study.MethodsThe study utilized the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) as the main data source. Scientific literature was gathered through title (TI) searches for original clinical research papers on dry needling published between 2004 and 2024, using ‘dry needling’ or ‘dry needle’ as the search term. Statistical analyses and visualizations of the literature information, such as keywords, countries, research institutions, and authors, were conducted using the bibliometric.com online platform and VOSviewer. This approach aimed to statistically analyze and visualize the key research entities, hotspots, and frontiers in dry needling research. Additionally, the study delved into collaborative networks, research outputs, hot topics, and trends within the field of dry needling.ResultsThis investigation encompassed 468 publications, with the year 2021 topping the charts for the highest publication output, amassing a total of 271 articles. The journal “Acupuncture in Medicine” emerged as the most frequently cited publication. The most impactful article was titled “Acupuncture and dry-needling for low back pain: An updated systematic review within the framework of the Cochrane Collaboration.” Spain took the lead as the most productive country in this domain, with the United States closely following. Cesar Fernández-de-las-Peñas emerged as the most prolific author in the field. The Universidad Rey Juan Carlos in Spain was recognized as the most productive institution for research in dry needling. As for journal keywords, “dry needling,” “trigger point,” and “myofascial pain syn-drome” were the triumvirate of terms most recurrently encountered.ConclusionThe field of dry needling research has witnessed significant growth in recent years, characterized by the emergence of novel trends such as comparative studies with acupuncture, exploration into the mechanisms of action, and a transition toward interdisciplinary approaches. As medical models evolve, the focus is expanding from the exclusive treatment of muscle pain to broader applications. Despite this progress, the domain is underscored by a paucity of large-scale, multicenter clinical trials and animal studies. There exists an imperative for enhanced collaboration among academic and research institutions. A more profound exploration and comprehensive research endeavors are essential to enhance our understanding and broaden the clinical application of dry needling techniques.
Testing the Safety of Piriformis Dry Needling Interventions: An Observational Study Evaluating the Predictive Value of Anthropometric and Demographic Factors
Objectives: The dry needling of the piriformis muscle (especially in the medial region) is a challenging procedure since there is a high risk of accidentally puncturing the sciatic nerve. This study aimed to explain the variance of the deep limit of the piriformis based on anthropometric and demographic predictors potentially associated with it by exploring if clinicians can select the optimal needle length needed accurately to avoid accidental punctures of the sciatic nerve during palpation-guided dry needling interventions. Methods: An observational study was conducted that included fifty-six patients with piriformis muscle syndrome. We recorded the skin-to-sciatic nerve distance at the location with greatest risk of accidental sciatic puncture (assessed with ultrasound imaging) and demographic (e.g., age, gender, height, weight and body mass index—BMI) and anthropometric (hip circumference) variables. Results: Thirty-four males (n = 34) and twenty-two females (n = 22) were analyzed. Although men presented a significantly greater hip circumference than women (p = 0.007), no skin-to-sciatic nerve distance differences were observed (p > 0.05). Correlation analyses revealed that the sciatic nerve’s depth is associated with weight, BMI and hip perimeter (all, p < 0.01) but not with age or height (p > 0.05). Due to shared variance and multicollinearity, the hip circumference was the only predictor included in the regression model, explaining 37.9% of the piriformis muscle’s deeper fascia depth variance (R2 Adjusted = 0.379). Conclusions: Although the use of landmarks and measuring the hip perimeter may result in greater dry needling accuracy and a lower risk of adverse events derived from accidental sciatic nerve puncture, ultrasound guidance is encouraged as is the safest method for avoiding serious adverse events.
Adverse Reactions to Dry Needling Therapy: Insights from Polish Physiotherapy Practice
Background/Objectives: The current study aimed to characterize the adverse reactions associated with dry needling (DN) treatments reported by Polish physiotherapists, with a secondary objective of investigating whether the level of DN experience influences the occurrence of these adverse effects. Methods: A total of 102 Polish physiotherapists, all with regular DN practice, participated in an ad hoc online survey. The participants were categorized by their level of experience in DN treatment: 44 with 0–2 years, 43 with 3–6 years, and 15 with more than 7 years of experience. The survey consisted of 27 questions focused on both mild and severe adverse effects resulting from DN treatments. Results: The results showed that in the short term (over the past week), minor bleeding was the most commonly reported mild adverse effect (70%), followed closely by slightly pain during treatment (68%). Slight pain following treatment was also reported by 52% of respondents. No significant relationship was found between experience with dry needling (DN) and the reporting of mild adverse effects, with the exception of tingling (X(2) = 10.958; p = 0.004). In the retrospective analysis of the past month, most respondents reported experiencing bleeding between one and three times (49%), while bruising occurred one to three times in 44% of cases. Similarly, 44% of respondents noted pain after treatment one to three times, and 47% experienced pain during DN at this frequency. A significant interaction with DN experience was observed in the frequency of drowsiness reported over the past month (X(10) = 19.735; p = 0.032). Conclusions: Severe adverse effects were extremely rare in clinical practice: pneumothorax and shock were each reported by 3% of respondents, nerve palsy by 14%, infection by 2%, and hospitalization by 1%. In conclusion, this study suggests that most adverse effects are mild, typically involving bleeding and slight pain during or after treatment. Additionally, DN experience does not appear to be a significant factor influencing the type or prevalence of these adverse effects.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
Contact Info
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Product
Resources
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.
