2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2008.05.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Drying kinetics of grape seeds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

28
147
1
7

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 282 publications
(201 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
28
147
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…In these curves, an increase of drying rate, given by the curve slope, with increase in temperature was observed, being consistent with the reported in literature for this product (Roberts;Kidd;Padilla-Zakour, 2008;Kaleemullah;Kailappan, 2006). On the other hand, orange seeds did not exhibit a constant rate period of drying, observing only the falling rate period, behavior was also observed by Cantu-Lozano et al (2013) in study with grapefruit seed.…”
Section: Experimental Drying Kineticssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In these curves, an increase of drying rate, given by the curve slope, with increase in temperature was observed, being consistent with the reported in literature for this product (Roberts;Kidd;Padilla-Zakour, 2008;Kaleemullah;Kailappan, 2006). On the other hand, orange seeds did not exhibit a constant rate period of drying, observing only the falling rate period, behavior was also observed by Cantu-Lozano et al (2013) in study with grapefruit seed.…”
Section: Experimental Drying Kineticssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Similar values were found in products such as grapefruit seeds (Cantú-Lozano et al, 2013) and grape seeds (Roberts;Kidd;Padilla-Zakour, 2008). Also, the D eff increase when the temperature increases for each drying velocity level.…”
Section: Mathematical Modelling Of Drying Kineticssupporting
confidence: 80%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Relative percentage deviation compares the absolute differences between the predicted moisture content with the experimental moisture content throughout the drying process. The relative percent errors below 10 % indicate very good fit (Roberts et al 2008;Ozdemir and Devres 1999). RMSE and CS compare the differences between the model predicted values of moisture ratios to the experimental moisture ratios.…”
Section: Statistical Analysis and Evaluation Of Drying Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%