2003
DOI: 10.1007/bf02481524
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Drying of porous building materials: hydraulic diffusivity and front propagation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, when the data are fitted by a power law, the shrinking (drying) time varies as t d ¼ 96h a 1.5 min and the swelling (wetting) time varies as t d ¼ 29h a 1.3 min (where h a is in mm), quite different from the Washburn law. This large difference between drying and wetting is to be expected due to the different mechanisms responsible for these processes; liquid water is driven by capillary forces while wetting, while drying is dominated by the slow diffusion of vapour through pores at late stages, which leads to large variations in the effective diffusion coefficient in drying porous media (Pel et al 1996;Lockington et al 2003). The coupling of large strains (up to 20%) to water transport and localization of viscous dissipation at a bottleneck in the material may account for this discrepancy in the wetting stage; indeed, when a bottleneck of size l b dominates water transport, we expect t $ h a l b /D.…”
Section: Pine Conesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, when the data are fitted by a power law, the shrinking (drying) time varies as t d ¼ 96h a 1.5 min and the swelling (wetting) time varies as t d ¼ 29h a 1.3 min (where h a is in mm), quite different from the Washburn law. This large difference between drying and wetting is to be expected due to the different mechanisms responsible for these processes; liquid water is driven by capillary forces while wetting, while drying is dominated by the slow diffusion of vapour through pores at late stages, which leads to large variations in the effective diffusion coefficient in drying porous media (Pel et al 1996;Lockington et al 2003). The coupling of large strains (up to 20%) to water transport and localization of viscous dissipation at a bottleneck in the material may account for this discrepancy in the wetting stage; indeed, when a bottleneck of size l b dominates water transport, we expect t $ h a l b /D.…”
Section: Pine Conesmentioning
confidence: 99%