2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.sna.2013.06.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DS-UWB indoor positioning system implementation based on FPGAs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The UWB platform proposed in [17] is an asynchronous DS-UWB indoor positioning system developed with Commercial Off-The-Shelf (COTS) components. It is formed by N = 4 emitting beacons placed on the ceiling of a highly complex environment and a receiver that works out its position.…”
Section: Uwb Platformmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The UWB platform proposed in [17] is an asynchronous DS-UWB indoor positioning system developed with Commercial Off-The-Shelf (COTS) components. It is formed by N = 4 emitting beacons placed on the ceiling of a highly complex environment and a receiver that works out its position.…”
Section: Uwb Platformmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For more implementation details, refer to [17]. Under this complex conditions, the UWB platform described in [17] has a poor performance.…”
Section: Uwb Platformmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In fact, a spectacular growth of studies about indoor location has been witnessed since RADAR [3] was proposed in 2000. The ubiquity of Wi-Fi Internet connectivity and smartphones make Wi-Fi-based positioning very popular [3,41,17,22,60,47,49,11,39,42], despite the diversity of the technologies available for indoor positioning: Radio-Frequency Identification (RFID) [33,51,9], Bluetooth [20,44], ZigBee [50], Ultrasound [30,26,55], Magnetic field variations [14,27], LED light [38,34], Ultra Wide Band [25,23], and Hybrid solutions [32], among others. The IPSs based on Wi-Fi fingerprinting techniques are preferred to those based on the propagation model, angle of arrival, time of arrival and time difference of arrival because they do not require any very specialized hardware, line-of-sight to the emitter, or knowledge about the precise location of radio emitters to operate [71,70].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%