1993
DOI: 10.1007/bf02663798
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DSC application for characterization of Urea/formaldehyde condensates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These have clearly shown that UF (pH5) is faster in developing a dry strength while tannin-UF is faster in developing both dry and wet bond strength in comparison to PF resins. Previous work by Chow and Steiner (1975) and also more recently Szesztay et al (1993) suggested that the first exothermic peak for UF resin corresponded to the initial strength built-up during the manufacture of plywood. The position of the first peak centered at 87 °C for catalyzed UF (PH5), 113°C for tannin-UF-formaldehyde adhesive and 138°C for uncatalyzed UF (added for comparison) is in agreement with the expected order of reactivity for these adhesives while the relative position of the second peak is not (see Table 4 and Fig.…”
Section: Particleboard Test Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These have clearly shown that UF (pH5) is faster in developing a dry strength while tannin-UF is faster in developing both dry and wet bond strength in comparison to PF resins. Previous work by Chow and Steiner (1975) and also more recently Szesztay et al (1993) suggested that the first exothermic peak for UF resin corresponded to the initial strength built-up during the manufacture of plywood. The position of the first peak centered at 87 °C for catalyzed UF (PH5), 113°C for tannin-UF-formaldehyde adhesive and 138°C for uncatalyzed UF (added for comparison) is in agreement with the expected order of reactivity for these adhesives while the relative position of the second peak is not (see Table 4 and Fig.…”
Section: Particleboard Test Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…1). In the case of UF, Szesztay et al (1993) indicated that a temperature of 150°C and above, elimination of formaldehyde as well as decomposition of methylene linkages take place. In fact, at these high temperatures both polymerization and decomposition are expected to occur.…”
Section: Particleboard Test Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Solid UF resins with higher F/U mole ratios (1.4 and 1.6) showed an endothermic peak around 190°C while low F/U mole ratio resins (1.0 and 1.2) had an endothermic peak around 250°C. These peaks ranged from 170 to 190°C, and are believed to be responsible for the melting of solid UF resins prior to the start of curing reaction [24]. However, exothermic T p values of solid UF resins were ranged from 240 to 274°C, depending on F/U mole ratio and heating rate (see Table 2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A more branched structure of UF resins requires more energy to melt solid state to liquid state prior to starting the curing reaction. Therefore, polycondensation reactions among various hydroxymethylated ureas, occurring at the later stage of curing process, resulted in an exothermic peak [24,25]. The presence of exothermic curing of liquid and solid UF resins makes it possible to estimate their cure kinetics by calculating activation energy of the curing reactions using the cure kinetic theories.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second exothermic peak at 110-130 °C was caused by the decomposition of the methylene ether bridges. [23] The peak temperature (T p ) for the condensation reaction of UF2 was a little lower than that of UF1, which might be related to the higher content of methylene and methylene ether groups proved by 13 C-NMR analysis. Activation energy (E a ) is a key factor to determine a reaction.…”
Section: Ftir Analysismentioning
confidence: 95%