2002
DOI: 10.1021/pr015504q
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DTASelect and Contrast:  Tools for Assembling and Comparing Protein Identifications from Shotgun Proteomics

Abstract: The components of complex peptide mixtures can be separated by liquid chromatography, fragmented by tandem mass spectrometry, and identified by the SEQUEST algorithm. Inferring a mixture's source proteins requires that the identified peptides be reassociated. This process becomes more challenging as the number of peptides increases. DTASelect, a new software package, assembles SEQUEST identifications and highlights the most significant matches. The accompanying Contrast tool compares DTASelect results from mul… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
1,193
0
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

6
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,356 publications
(1,197 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
1,193
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the protein sequence database was concatenated to a reversed version of the database in order to define Xcorr and DeltaCN values for an appropriate false positive rate of protein identification. DTASelect [25] was used to apply these identification criteria in a manner similar to that employed by Peng et al [26]. No cleavage bias was assumed when searching MS/MS spectra against the S. mansoni sequence database.…”
Section: Mudpit Analysis Of Espmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the protein sequence database was concatenated to a reversed version of the database in order to define Xcorr and DeltaCN values for an appropriate false positive rate of protein identification. DTASelect [25] was used to apply these identification criteria in a manner similar to that employed by Peng et al [26]. No cleavage bias was assumed when searching MS/MS spectra against the S. mansoni sequence database.…”
Section: Mudpit Analysis Of Espmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next, the candidate proteins are sorted based on the cumulative number of matching spectra obtained°at°the°organelle°level°(Figure°2,°Table°1°and Table°2),°computational°procedures°are°carried°out°on data that have been formatted and parsed into an SQL-style relational database. Although this database was°developed°for°local°use,°the°reader°is°directed°to°the many helpful stand-alone informatics software tools presently available for managing, assessing, and filtering large-scale MudPIT-type proteomic datasets that are freely available to academics from the Yates and Aebersold°research°laboratories°(e.g.,°DTASelect° [34]; http://fields.scripps.edu/°and°ProteinProphet° [35]; www.systemsbiology.org/).…”
Section: Database Searching and Statistical Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In evaluating spectra for inclusion, two different sets of criteria were used in the DTASelect and Contrast algorithms. 18 The "low" set used the settings −1 0.3 −2 0.3 −3 0.3 −Smn 5. This setting imposes a moderate cutoff normalized XCorr of 0.3 for peptide inclusion, limiting the listed peptides to sequences containing at least five residues and accepting the default of two peptides per protein for listed proteins.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%