2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2021.07.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dual-AAV delivering split prime editor system for in vivo genome editing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
70
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
4
70
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Notably, however, using the same AAV platform, gene correction levels ranging from 4.1% to 7.4% were measured in RPE65 -associated Leber congenital amaurosis mice after sub-retinal injections ( 58 ). In another recent study, a dual AAV protein trans-splicing system installed a G > T transversion within Dnmt1 at a frequency of 1.71 ± 1.35% 6 weeks after sub-retinal injections in mice ( 59 ). Notwithstanding these important proof-of-concepts, dual AAV designs are complex and relatively inefficient as they operate through only partially controllable intermolecular recombination events for assembling the proper full-length product from the total pool of truncated proteins expressed in co-transduced cells.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, however, using the same AAV platform, gene correction levels ranging from 4.1% to 7.4% were measured in RPE65 -associated Leber congenital amaurosis mice after sub-retinal injections ( 58 ). In another recent study, a dual AAV protein trans-splicing system installed a G > T transversion within Dnmt1 at a frequency of 1.71 ± 1.35% 6 weeks after sub-retinal injections in mice ( 59 ). Notwithstanding these important proof-of-concepts, dual AAV designs are complex and relatively inefficient as they operate through only partially controllable intermolecular recombination events for assembling the proper full-length product from the total pool of truncated proteins expressed in co-transduced cells.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the large size of prime editors makes them more difficult to deliver in vivo than Cas9 or base editors -a limitation impeding the developing of PEbased gene therapies. Recently, in vivo delivery of prime editors using dual-AAVs has been reported 16,21 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a previous study, PE2 had been split at 1005 and 1024 with Rhodothermus marinus (Rma) intein21 , and these two split-PE2 showed ~72.0% and ~75.8% editing efficiency compare with full-length PE2 at HEK3 loci, ~65.6% and 68.4% editing efficiency compare with full-length PE2 at VEGFA loci21 …”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…At 6 weeks post-injection, genomic DNA of mouse retina was collected (no cell sorting). This revealed an average editing efficiency of 1.71 ± 1.35% and average indels of 0.17 ± 0.01% in Dnmt1 locus ( Zhi et al, 2021 ). Similarly, a preprint by Jang et al showed an editing efficiency of 1.87% in the Atp7b locus in transduced mouse retina (no cell sorting) and no detectable indels were found.…”
Section: Crispr-based Gene Editing: a Brief Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One possibility proposed by the authors is that CBE-mediated indels may occur at a higher rate in retinal cells due to mutual exclusivity between uracil excision pathways and those pathways required for CBE-mediated editing outcomes ( Levy et al, 2020 ). Recently, AAV8-mediated delivery of split-PEs has also been shown to successful edit the Dnmt1 locus in the mouse retina using a CMV promoter ( Zhi et al, 2021 ). In this study, Zhi et al sub-retinally co-injected their split-intein PE along with an AAV8-CMV-GFP reporter at 6 weeks of age and found expression limited to photoreceptors and retinal pigment epithelium (RPE).…”
Section: Crispr-based Gene Editing: a Brief Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%