2012
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637x/757/2/124
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dual Active Galactic Nuclei: Deprojecting the Binary Cores

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This fraction was estimated by Shen et al (2011a) λ5007 fraction of ∼2.5% at 0.8 < z < 1.6. The influence of inclination and phase angle for selection of dual AGN through double-peaked emission line profiles was also investigated by Wang & Zhou (2012) in which they found that, at a phase angle of φ ≈ 50 • , we miss at least 50% of all AGN with double emission components. We note that this 50% correction is a lower limit since it does not account for instrumental resolution, and that applying additional corrections based on our completeness estimates would likely make the correction estimated in this manner similar to that of Shen et al (2011a).…”
Section: Samplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This fraction was estimated by Shen et al (2011a) λ5007 fraction of ∼2.5% at 0.8 < z < 1.6. The influence of inclination and phase angle for selection of dual AGN through double-peaked emission line profiles was also investigated by Wang & Zhou (2012) in which they found that, at a phase angle of φ ≈ 50 • , we miss at least 50% of all AGN with double emission components. We note that this 50% correction is a lower limit since it does not account for instrumental resolution, and that applying additional corrections based on our completeness estimates would likely make the correction estimated in this manner similar to that of Shen et al (2011a).…”
Section: Samplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, double-peaked emission is expected only in dual active SMBHs whose orbital planes are aligned relatively edge-on along our line of sight. Those systems whose orbital planes are aligned face-on are overlooked with these methods (Rosario et al 2011;Wang et al 2012). Although this scenario may be able to explain the discrepancy by a factor of a few, it is probably difficult to account for the difference by more than an order of magnitude, provided that the alignment of the orbital planes of two active SMBHs is random in terms of our line-ofsight.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the suggestion that double-peaked profiles could be produced by binary AGNs (Zhou et al 2004), much attention has been paid to this hypothesis, yet few definite cases are known. The most convincing examples can be found in CXO J1426+35 (Barrows et al 2012), EGSD2 J1420+4259 (Gerke et al 2007), NGC 6240 (Komossa et al 2003), COSMOS J100043+020637 (Comerford et al 2009b), SDSS J0952+2552 (McGurk et al 2011;Fu et al 2012) and so on (see the review in Wang & Zhou 2012, and table 1 in Ge et al 2012). Several systematic searches for AGNs with double-peaked [O III] emission lines have been performed in the DEEP2 survey sample (Gerke et al 2007;Comerford et al 2009a) and in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (hereafter SDSS) data releases (Xu & Komossa 2009;Wang et al 2009;Liu et al 2010bLiu et al ,2011Smith et al 2010;Ge et al 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%