2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.isatra.2018.10.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dual-axis control of flexure-based motion system for optical fibre transceiver assembly using fixed-order controller

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The second- and third-order controllers were synthesized for the current and voltage loops, respectively. A fixed-order robust H controller was synthesized for the two-degree-of-freedom (2-DOF) flexure-based motion system concerning the disturbances by Zhu et al (2019). The complexity of the high-order controllers in practice led researchers to obtain popular structured controllers such as linear quadratic regulator (LQR), lead-lag, PID, or third-order integral-lead (Type-III) controllers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second- and third-order controllers were synthesized for the current and voltage loops, respectively. A fixed-order robust H controller was synthesized for the two-degree-of-freedom (2-DOF) flexure-based motion system concerning the disturbances by Zhu et al (2019). The complexity of the high-order controllers in practice led researchers to obtain popular structured controllers such as linear quadratic regulator (LQR), lead-lag, PID, or third-order integral-lead (Type-III) controllers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The order of the resulting full‐order robust controller is equal to the order of the augmented plant, that is, the sum of the order of the three above mentioned function. In practical industrial control applications, fixed‐order (low‐order) controllers such as lead‐lag compensators and proportional‐integral‐derivative (PID) controller are preferred because of their easily adjustable structures, practicality and low processing requirements on embedded system [9]. The H control problem leads to an NP‐hard non‐convex problem in controller parameter space if a fixed‐order controller structure is considered instead of a full‐order controller in state space or linear matrix inequalities (LMI) based solution algorithms [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In view of the great potential for practical usage, the methodology of fixed-order controllers have attracted considerable attention for finite frequency specifications due to their simplicity, reliability, and ease of implementation [24,25]. Though the design of a fixed-order controller in the presence of parametric uncertainties is NPhard, a variety of design approaches have been rather successfully used including bilinear matrix inequality (BMI) [26,27], convex approximation [28,29] and iterative heuristic optimization [30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%