2015
DOI: 10.1109/lawp.2014.2355141
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dual-Band Circularly Polarized Cavity-Backed Crossed-Dipole Antennas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This paper proposes a new, yet simple approach to realize dual‐band dual‐sense CP antenna using crossed dipoles structure. Instead of using the feeding method presented in References , the proposed antenna is directly excited by coaxial line. For CP excitation, the dipoles' lengths are chosen differentially.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This paper proposes a new, yet simple approach to realize dual‐band dual‐sense CP antenna using crossed dipoles structure. Instead of using the feeding method presented in References , the proposed antenna is directly excited by coaxial line. For CP excitation, the dipoles' lengths are chosen differentially.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Compared to the ME dipole, the use of crossed dipoles to realize CP radiation is more convenient and less complicated structure as well. However, there still exist several disadvantages for the designs in References . First, CP diversity is not achieved as they are only able to produce the same sense of CP radiation (either right‐hand CP [RHCP] or left‐hand CP [LHCP]) for all operating bands.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of gain, high gain radiation over very wide frequency band can be obtained by proper tuning the cavity's shape. This method has been investigated in References , thus the procedure to optimize the cavity's dimensions is not necessary to present in this article.…”
Section: Full Band Uwb Dual‐polarized Antennamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The drawback of these antennas is their bi-directional radiation, which causes low broadside gain and is not suitable for many applications where unidirectional patterns are required. Cavity-backed antennas have been proposed to yield unidirectional radiation, a higher gain, and a better front-to-back ratio [6,7]. However, a relatively large antenna height is required to achieve good performance for these antennas.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%