2012 International Conference on Communications, Devices and Intelligent Systems (CODIS) 2012
DOI: 10.1109/codis.2012.6422179
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dual band microstrip patch antenna for wireless applications at 5.2 GHz and 5.8 GHz using CSSRR

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present work, To achieve dual-band operation using metamaterials here in this design capacitive matching is used instead of previously inset fe ed matching [7,8]. CSSRR in comparison to CSRR does not disturb current in dominant mode hence provides good radiation pattern.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In the present work, To achieve dual-band operation using metamaterials here in this design capacitive matching is used instead of previously inset fe ed matching [7,8]. CSSRR in comparison to CSRR does not disturb current in dominant mode hence provides good radiation pattern.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both CSSRR's resonate at 5.2 GHz and for 5.8 GHz patch resonates and some part of CSSRR also resonates [7]. Gap coupling provides matching of power from port to patch antenna through microstrip line while a via is introduced in center of patch to ground and it provides capacitive matching [7]. A good E-plane and H-plane radiation pattern at 5.2GHz and 5.8 GHz is shown in Figure 6(a) and (b) in addition back lobe is very small.…”
Section: 11 N �Bmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Figure 3 shows the surface current distribution of the antenna at center frequency 4.7 GHz. Surface current distribution or current density gives the better understanding of the antenna behavior at the desired frequency [13][14][15]. It gives the better understanding about which part of the antenna is resonating.…”
Section: Figure 2: Reflection Co-efficient Of the Proposed Antenna Dementioning
confidence: 99%