2023
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.3c05935
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dual-Channel-Ion Conductor Membrane for Low-Energy Lithium Extraction

Hongyu Ma,
Yun Xia,
Zhouyou Wang
et al.

Abstract: The development of energy-efficient and environmentally friendly lithium extraction techniques is essential to meet the growing global demand for lithium-ion batteries. In this work, a dual-channel ion conductor membrane was designed for a concentration-driven lithium-selective ion diffusion process. The membrane was based on a porous lithium-ion conductor, and its pores were modified with an anion-exchange polymer. Thus, the sintered lithium-ion conductors provided highly selective cation transport channels, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it is unclear whether such PA-CEMs can readily be made following the protocols for fabricating PA-based NFMs reported in the literature since the properties of the support layer (e.g., CEM vs polysulfone support) may substantially change the interfacial polymerization process and thus the final PA layer properties. We also note that membranes with ion-specific channels or other separation mechanisms may achieve better separation performance than the composite membranes considered here and is thus worthy of future investigation and comparison. ,, Furthermore, energy consumption and cost analysis are also necessary in future analysis for a comprehensive performance comparison, especially considering that one major benefit to substitute monovalent selective CEMs by NFMs is to reduce the membrane cost.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, it is unclear whether such PA-CEMs can readily be made following the protocols for fabricating PA-based NFMs reported in the literature since the properties of the support layer (e.g., CEM vs polysulfone support) may substantially change the interfacial polymerization process and thus the final PA layer properties. We also note that membranes with ion-specific channels or other separation mechanisms may achieve better separation performance than the composite membranes considered here and is thus worthy of future investigation and comparison. ,, Furthermore, energy consumption and cost analysis are also necessary in future analysis for a comprehensive performance comparison, especially considering that one major benefit to substitute monovalent selective CEMs by NFMs is to reduce the membrane cost.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…We also note that membranes with ion-specific channels or other separation mechanisms may achieve better separation performance than the composite membranes considered here and is thus worthy of future investigation and comparison. 14 , 76 , 77 Furthermore, energy consumption and cost analysis are also necessary in future analysis for a comprehensive performance comparison, especially considering that one major benefit to substitute monovalent selective CEMs by NFMs is to reduce the membrane cost.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, the technologies for extracting lithium from salt-lake brine mainly include precipitation, solvent extraction, adsorption, and membrane separation. Among them, membrane-based separation technologies, such as nanofiltration, electrodialysis, diffusion dialysis, and liquid membrane extraction, ,, are considered to be a clean strategy because of their high efficiency, low energy input, and low pollution. , The concentration-driven diffusion dialysis is independent from the pressure and electrical potentials, making it a cost- and energy-efficient process for ion separation. , …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%