Many Universities engage in Transnational Education (TNE) where their programmes are delivered at a branch campus located in an overseas country, or in partnership with a local higher education provider based in another country. There are many drivers for this approach including: the internationalisation of the home curriculum and student experience; the opportunity to promote student mobility through exchange programmes or short study experiences; demographic issues such as diminishing numbers of international students applying to study at the home institution; political factors including changes in immigration laws; financial objectives such as diversification of revenue streams building research or industrial networks; building the University brand overseas.There are various models for TNE including validated programmes, franchised delivery, joint or dual degrees, dual awards, twinning arrangements. This paper builds on previous work where one particular model for TNE, namely the dual award, was investigated. In this paper the authors turn their attention to the structural issues in the creation of a dual award. The paper investigates in depth a topic that arose and was touched upon briefly in previous work namely whether a programme of study is more than just the summation of its constituent learning outcomes.The paper concludes that through the application of constructive alignment a relative judgement can be made to satisfy the quality assurance requirements of both institutions and of external auditors. It goes on to pose an interesting follow-up question in that it may be possible to establish equivalence in standards but that there might be significant differences in the quality of the student experience.