2016
DOI: 10.3837/tiis.2016.10.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dual Detection-Guided Newborn Target Intensity Based on Probability Hypothesis Density for Multiple Target Tracking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As we can see (13) that Poisson and Bernoulli part can be predicted separately. Given the posterior PMBM density at k-1th scanning period parameterized by Poisson intensity 1 ( )…”
Section: Prediction Processmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As we can see (13) that Poisson and Bernoulli part can be predicted separately. Given the posterior PMBM density at k-1th scanning period parameterized by Poisson intensity 1 ( )…”
Section: Prediction Processmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…According to whether the predicted distribution and posterior distribution have the same form as the initial prior, the filter on RFS can be divided into the conjugate RFS filter and the nonconjugate RFS filter [10][11]. The probability hypothesis density (PHD) filter [12][13], the cardinalized probability hypothesis density (CPHD) filter [14], the multiple target multi-Bernoulli (MeMBer) filter [15] belong to non-conjugate RFS filter, i.e., to approximate the posterior multi-target density at low cost. The conjugate RFS filter possesses higher filtering accuracy and easier computation than the non-conjugate one due to the conjugacy property [16] and it can be divided into two types.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Target tracking typically assumes that each target can produce at most one measurement each scan. However, in a modern high-precision sensor system, a target may produce more than a single measurement per scan, such a target called an extended target, and the typical multiple target tracking (MTT) approaches [1][2][3] fail to track the extended targets accuratly. Therefore, a growing number of works have been done for extended target tracking (ETT) [4][5][6][7][8][9] in resent years, and this is espacially true for multiple extended target tracking (METT) [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An important implementation of a MTT PHD filter is the Gaussian mixture PHD (GM-PHD) filter [2], which employs the Gaussian mixture method to approximate the target PHD. The discussion of the newborn target intensity of a GM-PHD can be found in [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%