2002
DOI: 10.7748/mhp2002.04.5.7.16.c1715
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dual diagnosis: developing the skill base

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the three studies which featured substance misuse staff, these workers perceived more systems failures (accessibility, co‐ordination, etc.) than mental health professionals (Kavanagh et al . 2000, Barnes et al .…”
Section: Analysis and Discussion Of Key Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In the three studies which featured substance misuse staff, these workers perceived more systems failures (accessibility, co‐ordination, etc.) than mental health professionals (Kavanagh et al . 2000, Barnes et al .…”
Section: Analysis and Discussion Of Key Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2000, Richmond & Foster 2003), a combination of mental health nurses working in either generic mental health or addiction services (Munro et al . 2007), rural mental health professionals (Deans & Soar 2005), combinations of mental health and substance misuse staff who provide services for people with comorbidity (Maslin et al . 2001, Barnes et al .…”
Section: Characteristics Of the Literature Reviewedmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…By contrast, an area such as Gwynedd, which has initially invested in a single worker, in a primarily liaison and developmental role, may feel the need to narrow the working definition of dual diagnosis in order to stem the flow of eligible referrals. A lack of coordination in approach to this client group particularly by mental health services has been further highlighted most recently by the Audit Commission (2002) and fellow clinicians working in the area of dual diagnosis (Barnes et al 2002).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%