2004
DOI: 10.1002/anie.200462003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dual Effect of Synthetic Aminoglycosides: Antibacterial Activity against Bacillus anthracis and Inhibition of Anthrax Lethal Factor

Abstract: Defence against bioterrorism: Recent events have created an urgent need for therapeutic strategies to treat anthrax, an infectious disease caused by the toxigenic bacterium Bacillus anthracis. A new class of aminoglycosides (see picture) are powerful inhibitors under physiological conditions of the anthrax lethal factor, which has a major role in the disease, and function simultaneously as antibiotics against B. anthracis.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
43
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
43
2
Order By: Relevance
“…[2][3][4] The potential for bioterrorism and inadequate treatments for anthrax, especially at late stages of infection, have amplified interest in finding effective anthrax lethal factor inhibitors (LFi). Several approaches have led to the identification of a variety of LFi, [5][6][7][8] including library screening and optimization, [9,10] fragment-based NMR screening (BI-11B3, Figure 1), [11] mass-spectrometry-based screening, [12] and re-examination of inhibitors of other metallo-A C H T U N G T R E N N U N G proteinases and related hydroxamate-based compounds. [9,[13][14][15] An example of the latter class is the broad-spectrum matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor (MMPi) GM6001 (Figure 1), which was found to be an effective inhibitor of LF in vitro and in cell culture.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2][3][4] The potential for bioterrorism and inadequate treatments for anthrax, especially at late stages of infection, have amplified interest in finding effective anthrax lethal factor inhibitors (LFi). Several approaches have led to the identification of a variety of LFi, [5][6][7][8] including library screening and optimization, [9,10] fragment-based NMR screening (BI-11B3, Figure 1), [11] mass-spectrometry-based screening, [12] and re-examination of inhibitors of other metallo-A C H T U N G T R E N N U N G proteinases and related hydroxamate-based compounds. [9,[13][14][15] An example of the latter class is the broad-spectrum matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor (MMPi) GM6001 (Figure 1), which was found to be an effective inhibitor of LF in vitro and in cell culture.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is clear that the biological activity of aminoglycosides can arise from interactions with targets other than ribosomal RNA, as shown recently by their potent inhibition of Bacillus anthracis Lethal Factor protease activity (27). Future efforts should be focused on the detailed characterization of sequences identified in this work to identify new RNA motifs and their interactions with small-molecule ligands.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…However, much lower concentrations of polycationic compounds such as neomycin B are required to inhibit LF when assayed in this manner. At physiological salt concentration (150 mM KCl) the K i for neomycin B increases to around 60 M. Interestingly, among a series of neomycin B derivatives evaluated for inhibition of LF, a disulfide-linked dimeric analog could inhibit at physiological salt with a K i of 1 M [99]. Though this compound itself would be expected to convert to the less active monomeric species in the reducing environment of the cytosol, the potential for generating redox stable dimeric neomycin B analogs that maintain activity holds promise.…”
Section: Other Competitive Inhibitors Of Lfmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This finding suggests that it might be possible to treat anthrax with a single agent that would act both as an antibiotic and anti-toxin. Indeed, among a series of neomycin B derivatives synthesized and tested, many (including the parent compound itself) could both inhibit LF in vitro and block growth of B. anthracis in culture [99]. Unfor- tunately, the high potency originally ascribed to neomycin B and its analogs appears to be sensitive to in vitro assay conditions, and the drug is unlikely to substantially inhibit LF in vivo.…”
Section: Other Competitive Inhibitors Of Lfmentioning
confidence: 99%