2020
DOI: 10.1089/end.2020.0243
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dual-Energy Computed Tomography for Stone Type Assessment: A Pilot Study of Dual-Energy Computed Tomography with Five Indices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rudenko et al report that dual-energy CT could evaluate the chemical composition of all stone types with speci city and accuracy ranging between 85% and 100% using the Z eff value and other parameters. [13] Material separation means that the spectral image is transformed into images of the base-pairs materials by attenuation measurements and mathematical methods. The water/iodine-attenuating base-pair images usually form the basis of this approach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rudenko et al report that dual-energy CT could evaluate the chemical composition of all stone types with speci city and accuracy ranging between 85% and 100% using the Z eff value and other parameters. [13] Material separation means that the spectral image is transformed into images of the base-pairs materials by attenuation measurements and mathematical methods. The water/iodine-attenuating base-pair images usually form the basis of this approach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the introduction of commercially available dual-energy CT scanners, 53 it is nowadays possible to identify differences in tissue composition. 54 This feature may aid to distinguish in routine clinical exams these two different types of calcium. The capability of differentiating between calcium subtypes may further improve our understanding of the unique roles played by each type of calcium in predicting stroke risk.…”
Section: The Calcium Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ilyas et al (25) analyzed 60 stones in 53 patients and found that the sensitivity and specificity of DECT to differentiate UA and non-UA stones were both 100%, and 97.8% and 92.3% for CO and non-CO stones. Many studies have shown that DECT can distinguish UA and calcified stones in vivo, with an accuracy of up to 100%, and has potential for detection of mixed stones (26,27). However, compared with unenhanced CT, the cost of DECT equipment and examinations are more expensive, the clinical promotion is insufficient, and it cannot be carried out as an emergency program.…”
Section: Determination Of Stone Composition With Ctmentioning
confidence: 99%