2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jocd.2012.01.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry Interpretation: A Simple Equation for Height Correction in Preteenage Children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the females, there was no significant difference between the groups ( p = .7847). Our height correction for DXA BMD Z ‐scores was not undertaken because of the disproportionate stature of the XLH group that would compromise comparison …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the females, there was no significant difference between the groups ( p = .7847). Our height correction for DXA BMD Z ‐scores was not undertaken because of the disproportionate stature of the XLH group that would compromise comparison …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two-dimensional measurements of the skeleton via DXA can underestimate BMD in shorter individuals and overestimate BMD in tall individuals (Zhang et al 2012), since DXA measurements do not fully account for body size. All three BMD studies reported weight in PKU and control subjects, but only two studies reported height.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although authors still found that BMD was lower in PKU subjects, experts acknowledge that measurement of BMD in short individuals can underestimate BMD. Future studies of BMD in PKU subjects should correct measurements for height, using published equations developed for this purpose (Zhang et al 2012). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for subject 1 showed a lumbar spine BMD Z-score of +8.1 at 2 years of age, and +11.9 at 5 years of age. Because she has short stature, these greatly elevated bone density scores are actually underestimates (6).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%