1987
DOI: 10.1021/j100291a017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dual fluorescence of diphenylpolyenes

Abstract: K(0-0) << k:(a") and Ty was moderately active in the TI --So nonradiative process could not be interpreted on the basis of C, molecular symmetry. These results were explained by introducing a higher C2, symmetry for T, PP.Near room temperature emission spectra of solutions of diphenylhexatriene and diphenyloctatetraene in various solvents show a weak band on the high-energy side of the 2'A, (SI) -l'A, (So) fluorescence. This weak band is assigned as the origin of fluorescence from the l'B, (S,) state on the ba… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

8
83
0
2

Year Published

1993
1993
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
8
83
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…5 While water does not shift the wavelength of the emission bands, its low polarizability, a S, water = 0.206, compared to 0.222 of ethanol and 0.284 of DMSO at 30 °C, destabilizes the S 2 orbital and reduces the S 2 -S 1 coupling, which are reflected as a weak fluorescence emission (low F F ). 9,15 However, the large decrease in the fluorescence intensity for such low water percentage in the solvent cannot be attributed to a simple solvent polarizability effect, as demonstrated by the fluorescence intensity decay of 27% for the addition of 10% water in methanol. 2 The a S of methanol is even smaller than that of water (a S, methanol = 0.203).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…5 While water does not shift the wavelength of the emission bands, its low polarizability, a S, water = 0.206, compared to 0.222 of ethanol and 0.284 of DMSO at 30 °C, destabilizes the S 2 orbital and reduces the S 2 -S 1 coupling, which are reflected as a weak fluorescence emission (low F F ). 9,15 However, the large decrease in the fluorescence intensity for such low water percentage in the solvent cannot be attributed to a simple solvent polarizability effect, as demonstrated by the fluorescence intensity decay of 27% for the addition of 10% water in methanol. 2 The a S of methanol is even smaller than that of water (a S, methanol = 0.203).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, a solvent with high polarizability stabilizes the S 2 orbital and favors the S 2 -S 1 coupling, leading to a high fluorescence yield. 9,15 The slightly decrease in the polarizability of organic solvents with the increase in the temperature destabilizes the 1 B u * state. The resulting decrease of the S 1 -S 2 coupling promotes a decrease of F F .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The S1 state of DPA is nonfluorescent, while many diphenylpolyenes emit fluorescence from the S1 state and the S2 fluorescence appears on the higher-energy side of the S1 --> S0 fluorescence [13,15]. Such difference may be partially due to the rapid S1 → Τ1 intersystem crossing of DPA but the more strict forbidden factor of the Si-S0 dipole transition of DPA compared with that of diphenylpolyenes should be responsible for the nonfluorescent character of the S 1 state of DPA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the 1 ^ <-1 1 A g transition the converse applies. Since the l 1 B u -2 1 A g energy gap in DPH is sufficiently small for thermal repopulation to occur to the ^B,, state, which is reflected by the delayed fluorescence from the state observed by Alford and Palmer [12,13] and others [14,15] in the form of a shoulder at the onset of DPH fluorescence spectra, the fluorescence can be emitted from both the lower 2 1 A g state (S t ) and 1 1 B U state (S 2 ) with a slightly higher energy. The investigations of Felder et al [16] of the transient behaviour of DPH and DPO carried out using picosecond time-resolved fluorescence spectroscopy have shown that, contrary to DPO, the prompt fluorescence of DPH from the 1 state is weak, exhibiting an abormally long decay time (> 30 ps).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%