2008
DOI: 10.1080/00952990701764623
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dual-Focus Mutual Aid for Co-Occurring Disorders: A Quasi-Experimental Outcome Evaluation Study

Abstract: Previous observational research has indicated the effectiveness of a 12-step, dual-focus mutual aid group, Double Trouble in Recovery (DTR), for assisting individuals to recover from co-occurring substance use and psychiatric disorders. The current study extends this line of research by evaluating DTR with a quasi-experimental design; controlled designs are rare in studies of mutual aid. Patient outcomes in the same psychiatric day treatment program were compared for two consecutive admission cohorts character… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For patients with both psychiatric illness and current substance misuse, a practical approach to increasing social support is to encourage participation in “dual focus” self-help groups that provide support for recovery from both problems. Recent research has shown that such dual focus group participation can reduce both substance misuse and increase adherence to psychiatric medication (Magura et al, 2002; Magura, Rosenblum, Villano, Vogel, Fong, & Betzler, 2008a; Magura, Villano, Rosenblum, Vogel, & Betzler, 2008b). Thus, participation in such groups should be encouraged by mental health and addiction treatment clinicians who work with patients with co-occurring disorders.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For patients with both psychiatric illness and current substance misuse, a practical approach to increasing social support is to encourage participation in “dual focus” self-help groups that provide support for recovery from both problems. Recent research has shown that such dual focus group participation can reduce both substance misuse and increase adherence to psychiatric medication (Magura et al, 2002; Magura, Rosenblum, Villano, Vogel, Fong, & Betzler, 2008a; Magura, Villano, Rosenblum, Vogel, & Betzler, 2008b). Thus, participation in such groups should be encouraged by mental health and addiction treatment clinicians who work with patients with co-occurring disorders.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter may require a clinic to take the initiative in helping patients establish such a group, since knowledge of this option is still limited and since patients may not be able to negotiate the logistics of setting up a group on their own. Once established, however, dual focus groups such as Double Trouble in Recovery have been shown to operate successfully according to standard 12-step principles (Magura et al, 2008a). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although some literature has described the effectiveness of specialized 12-step groups similar to DDA (Rosenblum et al, 2014;Timko, Sutkowi, & Moos, 2010;Aase, Jason, & Robinson, 2008;Magura et al, 2008;Magura, 2008), minimal information exists regarding first-person experiences in 12-step programs due to the required anonymity of traditional 12-step fellowships. Tradition 11 of AA states, "Our public relations policy is based on attraction rather than promotion; we need always maintain personal anonymity at the level of press, radio and films" (Alcoholic Anonymous…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Double Trouble in Recovery is a 12 step-based dual-focus mutual aid group designed for adults with dual diagnoses. The results from this study report improvement in substance abuse outcome but not in psychiatric outcome (Magura et al, 2008). Seeking Safety and Creating Change are two group behavioral therapy models for individuals suffering from both PTSD and substance abuse disorders.…”
Section: Current Status Of Dual Diagnosis Researchmentioning
confidence: 95%