“…Consequently, the superior proton conductivity of 1 may be ascribed to the shorter proton transport distances and more abundant proton numbers. The optimal σ value of 1 (1.69 × 10 −4 S cm −1 , at 50 °C and 98% RH) is comparable to many MOFs-based proton conductors, [Eu 4 (HL) 2 (SBA) 4 (H 2 O) 6 ]·9H 2 O (H 3 L = (4-carboxypiperidyl)- N -methylenephosphonic acid, KHSBA = 4-sulfobenzoic acid monopotassium salt, 2.60 × 10 −4 S cm −1 , at 95 °C and 95% RH), 36 (Me 2 NH 2 )(Me 2 NH)[In(mdhbqdc) 2 ] (H 2 mdhbqdc = dimethyl 3,6-dihydroxy-2,5-benzoquinone-1,4-dicarboxylic acid, 2.10 × 10 −4 S cm −1 , at 30 °C under 95% RH). 37 At the same time, the optimal σ value of 2 (3.52 × 10 −6 S cm −1 , at 50 °C and 98% RH) is also comparable to many MOF-based proton conductors, for instance {[Dy 4 (OH) 4 (U) 2 (H 2 O) 8 ]·4.6H 2 O·1.4CH 3 CN} n (2.96 × 10 −6 , at 80 °C, 95% RH), 38 UiO-66-NH 2 (3.5 × 10 −6 S cm −1 , at 80 °C and 98% RH).…”