Dual-Gendered Leadership: Gender-Inclusive Scientific-Political Public Health Communication Supporting Government COVID-19 Responses in Atlantic Canada

Abstract

This research aims to identify the influence of woman leadership on improving the traditional man-dominated scientific-political communication towards positive COVID-19-driven public health interventions. Across Canada, dual-gendered leadership (women chief medical officers and men prime minister/premiers) at both federal and provincial levels illustrated a positive approach to “flatten the curve” during the first and second waves of COVID-19. With the four provinces of New Brunswick, Newfoundland and Labrador, Nova Scotia, and Prince Edward Island, Atlantic Canada formed the “Atlantic Bubble”, which has become a great example domestically and internationally of successfully mitigating the pandemic while maintaining societal operation. Three provinces have benefitted from this complementary dual-gendered leadership. This case study utilized a scoping media coverage review approach, quantitatively examining how gender-inclusive scientific-political cooperation supported effective provincial responses in Atlantic Canada during the first two waves of COVID-19. This case study discovers that (1) at the provincial government level, woman leadership of mitigation, advocating, and coordination encouraged provincial authorities to adapt science-based interventions and deliver consistent and supportive public health information to the general public; and (2) at the community level, this dual-gendered leadership advanced community cohesion toward managing the community-based spread of COVID-19. Future studies may apply a longitudinal, retrospective approach with Canada-wide or cross-national comparison to further evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of dual-gendered leadership.

Adaptability, Interdisciplinarity, Engageability: Critical Reflections on Green Social Work Teaching and Training

“…This multi-disaster context features all three types of hazards, namely, natural hazards, technological hazards, and intentional and willful hazards. Notably, the global public health emergency of the COVID-19 pandemic, progressing from local zoonotic disease (a natural hazard) to an international catastrophe, profoundly impacted international communities, uncovering tremendous societal injustices, and jeopardized inhabitants and co-inhabitants’ physical health, mental wellness, and overall well-being [ 44 , 45 , 46 ]. Throughout Canada, climate change-induced natural hazards, such as annual wildfires, floods, extreme high and low temperatures, snowstorms, and hurricanes, further increased environmental and social injustices for vulnerable and marginalized groups and negatively affected their health and well-being [ 47 , 48 , 49 ].…”

Physical health caregiver, mental wellness supporter, and overall well-being advocate: Women's roles towards animal welfare during the COVID-19 emergency response

“…While previous gendered hazards and disaster studies were primarily vulnerability-focused [ 12 ], the gender analysis scope has expanded to include current studies portraying women's diverse roles associated with their private and public responsibilities, such as caring for family and neighbors [ 3 ], supporting community development [ 13 ], and advocating for policy decision-making [ 14 ]. These studies either encompass the entire disaster management cycle [ 15 ] or focus on certain disaster stages, such as pre-disaster preparedness [ 16 ], emergency response [ 17 ], and post-disaster reconstruction [ 18 ].…”

Evaluation of the readability, understandability, and actionability of COVID-19 public health messaging in Atlantic Canada

“…Throughout the pandemic, the Atlantic region of Canada was hailed as a "success story" as a result of reporting so few COVID-19 cases in comparison to other jurisdictions (Wu and Mackenzie, 2021). Yet this success was not random.…”