2012 IEEE Globecom Workshops 2012
DOI: 10.1109/glocomw.2012.6477614
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dual-hop AF relaying systems in mixed nakagami-m and Rician links

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be shown that the PDF and the CDF of the end-to-end SNR, γ t , can be found, similar to [20, eqs. (14)- (15)] respectively as…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It can be shown that the PDF and the CDF of the end-to-end SNR, γ t , can be found, similar to [20, eqs. (14)- (15)] respectively as…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Identically distributed fading links are assumed in this example such that K 1 = K 2 = K, m 1 = m 2 = m and γ 1 = γ 2 = γ. Note that the outage probabilities for Rician systems are directly obtained using (15), while those for Nakagami-m systems are obtained using [9, eq. (2)].…”
Section: Numerical Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In these works, they derived a cumulative distribution function (CDF) to analyse the system performance. In [4,5], the authors proposed exact expressions for two-hop AF relaying systems over Nakagami-m/Rician fading channels as well as Rician/Rician and Nakagami-m/Nakagami-m fading channels. Kapucu et al [6,7] investigated the performance of two-hop regenerative relaying systems under mixed Rayleigh/Gamma and Rayleigh/Weibull fading conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, performance of the dual-hop cooperative network is carried out in [31], over mixed Rician and Nakagami-m fading environment. Further, in [32], various performance measures such as outage probability, average symbol error probability, and ergodic capacity are derived for the 100…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%