Immunotherapy has represented a novel and cutting-edge approach to treating patients with many types of metastatic cancers in recent years, transforming outcomes for patients who previously had limited options. Immunotherapy enhances the body's natural defenses to target and eliminate cancer cells.The agents used are immune checkpoint inhibitors that target specific sites within the immune system, particularly focusing on T cells and their interactions with cancer cells or antigen-presenting cells. 1 The primary sites at T cells of action include the programmed cell death 1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) axis and cytotoxic T-lymphocyteassociated protein 4 (CTLA-4). The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved several immunotherapy agents, and each could have different modes of action targeting these sites in various cancers. In 2020, pembrolizumab, a PD-1 inhibitor, was approved for the treatment of patients with anaplastic thyroid carcinoma. 2 In 2 nonrandomized phase 2 clinical trials in this issue of JAMA Oncology, Sehgal et al 3 and Cabanillas et al 4 explored the applications of immunotherapy in treating patients with aggressive thyroid cancer.Sehgal et al 3 evaluated the efficacy of dual immune checkpoint inhibition using the anti-PD-1 (nivolumab) and anti-CTLA-4 (ipilimumab) in 49 patients with advanced aggressive thyroid carcinomas. The carcinomas included 19 papillary thyroid carcinomas, 2 follicular thyroid carcinomas, 6 oncocytic carcinomas, 5 poorly differentiated thyroid carcinomas, 10 anaplastic thyroid carcinomas, and 7 medullary thyroid carcinomas. The study emphasized the importance of selecting immunotherapy based on biomarkers and histological types of thyroid carcinomas.Sehgal and colleagues 3 noted that a high tumor mutational burden in patients with thyroid carcinoma was associated with a higher objective response rate and improved progression-free survival. On the other hand, NRAS sequence variations in thyroid carcinomas were found to be associated with worse progression-free survival and overall survival. In addition, this trial of dual immune checkpoint inhibitors highlighted the importance of histological and molecular typing of aggressive thyroid carcinomas when selecting therapies. The objective response rate was high (30%) only in anaplastic thyroid carcinoma, which merits further evaluation. In other aggressive thyroid carcinomas, responses were noted in patients with oncocytic thyroid carcinoma and poorly differentiated thyroid carcinoma. The difference in responses to therapy further demonstrated that these carcinomas were different in their molecular profiles.