Dual materiality and knowing in petroleum production

The Sociomaterialty of Information Systems: Current Status, Future Directions

“…The stream of research, then, that emerges following the original perspective on sociomateriality is primarily demarcated by relational ontology, posthumanist performativity, and a nonessentialist view of materiality (Orlikowski 2007(Orlikowski , 2009Orlikowski and Scott 2008). It has been debated, adopted and developed further through empirical studies (e.g., CecezKecmanovic et al 2014;Jones 2013;Orlikowski and Scott 2013;Østerlie et al 2012;Scott and Orlikowski 2012;Shotter 2013). While this stream adopts agential realism as an exemplar foundation, offering a particular ontological and epistemological position and vocabulary (Barad 2003(Barad , 2007, there are others equally bold and innovative.…”

Situated with Infrastructures: Interactivity and Entanglement in Sensor Data Interpretation

“…It is no longer the only heat exchange with the surrounding air that triggers changes in the thermometer's internal state, but also the heat generated with the sunlight. This facet of aspectual punctuation is central to subsurface professionals' interpretation practices because they need to make inferences of what such changes in the sensor can tell them about the surroundings (Almklov, Østerlie, & Haavik, 2012;Østerlie et al, 2012) Along with aspectual punctuation, digital sensors also make samples at points in time, and most sensors-at least in petroleum production-register the spatial coordinates. We refer to this as "temporal" and "spatial" punctuation.…”

“…We have elsewhere (e.g., Almklov, 2008;Østerlie et al, 2012) gone into detail in describing how knowledge of contextual particularities pertaining to individual wells, types of equipment, people's competence, and so on weigh heavily on interpretative processes. This knowledge is largely grown out of presence at the operational department.…”

The Facets of Sociomateriality: A Systematic Mapping of Emerging Concepts and Definitions

“…Along the same lines, Monteiro et al [50] analyze how similarity between technologically mediated work practices is achieved as a political, pragmatic, and performative process. [5] x x (multidimensional networks) Almklov et al [9] x x (performativity of representations and models) Orlikowski [14] x x Monteiro et al [28] x x (performativity) Kuk and Davies [32] x x (performativity; Tweets as data) x (Case study: Linked Open Data) Johri [35] x (ANT and other) x x (sociomaterial bricolage; local vs. global) Gasson [36] x (ANT) x (political attachment and local group mobilization in misalignments) Thompson [37] x (later ANT) x (performativity of learning practices) x (Case study: online learning) Nicolini [38] x (ANT and other) x x (zoom-in/zoom-out) Al-Mahmood [39] x (ANT) x (multimedia as data) x (online learning; spaces emerging relationally) Awazu and Newell [41] x x (knowing through practice) x (implementation as cultural and historical practice) Introna and Hayes [42] x x (historical and cultural traditions) x (global practices vs. local contexts) Bratteteig and Verne [43] x x (entanglements + imbrications) Zorina and Avison [44] x x (inter-organizational imbrications) Leclerq et al [48] x x (norms) Monteiro and Rolland [49] x x (performativity) x (trans-situadedness) Monteiro et al [50] x x (performativity) x (family resemblance of distributed practices) Van Osch and Mendelson [51] x x (multimedia as data) x (Case study: multimedia) Orlikowski [52] x (materiality as scaffolding) Østerlie et al [53] x x (dual materiality; knowing emergent from different levels of materiality) Baptista et al [31] x x (institutionalization of technology) O'Farrell et al [54] x Riemer and Johnston [34] x (circular reference) Svahn et al [55] x…”