2005
DOI: 10.1109/tpel.2005.850907
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dual-Mode Control of Tri-State Boost Converter for Improved Performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In equation (3), the symbols are steady state capacitor voltage, and inductor current which are 81.25V and 13.5A respectively.…”
Section: A Boost Convertermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In equation (3), the symbols are steady state capacitor voltage, and inductor current which are 81.25V and 13.5A respectively.…”
Section: A Boost Convertermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been shown in [1][2] [3], that by introducing a freewheeling state, the dynamic performance would be improved. The converter is analyzed separately in the three modes and combined using the state space averaging, which can be written as,…”
Section: ) Freewheeling Modementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The bandwidth as well as the transient response is limited by this RHP zero even with current-mode-control. Several literatures have been reported to overcome this RHP zero issue and try to enable a fast transient response [1][2][3][4]. Fixed-on-time control is one of them.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The comprehensive analysis and verifications of the proposed control method will be presented here. The uniform controller exhibits the following properties: 1) it retains the advantages of boundary control with second-order switching surface for buck converter, such as fast dynamic response and well-defined control parameters; 2) the same controller is applicable for different type of converters with the input variables to the controller being modified accordingly, implying the feasibility to manufacture universal analogue controller ICs or provide universal digital solutions for different converters; 3) the switching surface for each converter is well-defined and does not need to modify the structure of power stage, like the ones (Viswanathan et al, 2005;Calvente et al, 2004;Krein, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%