The aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (aaRSs) 2 catalyze the activation of cognate amino acids and their transfer to the 3Ј-end of corresponding tRNA molecules. The aaRSs are a highly conserved family of enzymes comprised of two distinct structural groups referred to as classes I and II (1-3), with a notable exception of LysRS representatives, which belong to both classes (4). Although the catalytic mechanisms of various aaRSs are broadly similar (5), each enzyme has developed a high specificity in recognizing its cognate amino acid and tRNA, which is pivotal for accurate translation of the genetic code (1). The discrimination of the amino acids is based on recognizing the differences in the size and charge of the molecules (6). The specificity of tRNA selection depends on a set of identity determinants that are mostly located at two distal extremities: the anticodon loop and the amino acid accepting stem. In a few instances, identity elements are also found in the D-arm, T-arm, and variable loop. They can either act as positive determinants that enhance aminoacylation or negative ones that prevent aminoacylation. The recognition of tRNAs by synthetases can also be affected by the modification of particular nucleotides (7,8). AaRSs show divergent strategies for tRNA recognition. Most notably, class I and class II aaRSs (including pyrrolysyl-tRNA synthetase, see Ref. 9) approach tRNAs from the minor and major groove sides of the acceptor stem, respectively (10). Although the majority of determinants are in direct contact with cognate synthetases (8), the aminoacylation fidelity is controlled by kinetic differences more than by binding affinities (11).Seryl-tRNA synthetases (SerRSs), which catalyze the aminoacylation of several tRNA Ser isoacceptors and tRNA Sec with serine, can be divided into two structurally different groups: bacterial-type SerRSs function in a variety of archaeal, bacterial, and eukaryotic organisms, whereas the methanogenic-type was found only in methanogenic archaea (12, 13). Furthermore, based on sequence comparison (14, 15) and x-ray analyses, two subgroups of bacterial-type SerRSs were identified: one consists of the enzymes from bacterial sources, best represented by those from Thermus thermophilus (16) and Escherichia coli (3), and an archaeal/eukaryal-type, structurally related to SerRS from archaeon Pyrococcus horikoshii (17).All SerRSs are functional homodimers with a C-terminal active site domain typical for class II aaRSs and an N-terminal domain that is responsible for binding of the long